vivo X200 FE vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Honor Magic6 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers more consistent thermal management, and the higher peak brightness of 1578 nits provides superior outdoor visibility. However, the X200 FE’s faster 90W charging is a significant advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 FE | Honor Magic6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 23 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 05 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Core or Shield Glass, Mohs level 5 | NanoCrystal Shield |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~461 ppi density) | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 97.6 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 / 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.7, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF (55cm - ∞), OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 7 (market specific), dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 100% in 57 min Reverse wired | 80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh (Austria only) | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Luxe Grey (Black Luxe), Frost Blue (Blue Breeze), Amber Yellow (Yellow Glow), Pink Vibe | Black, Green, Blue, Purple, White |
| Models | V2503 | BVL-AN16, BVL-N49 |
| Price | € 799.00 / $ 721.58 / ₹ 59,998 | € 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 58:09h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (100 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X200 FE
- Faster 90W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance
- Unique Dimensity 9300+ core configuration
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Slightly lower battery endurance score
Honor Magic6 Pro
- More consistent sustained performance
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower wired charging compared to vivo X200 FE
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic6 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1578 nits compared to the vivo X200 FE’s 1758 nits. While the X200 FE has a higher peak brightness, the Magic6 Pro’s panel likely benefits from superior efficiency and color accuracy. Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, which contribute to power efficiency, but the Magic6 Pro’s display technology is likely to be LTPO, enabling variable refresh rates for further power savings. The difference in brightness will be most noticeable outdoors under direct sunlight, giving the Magic6 Pro an edge for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset plays a crucial role. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Honor Magic6 Pro will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Dimensity 9300+ is no slouch, but Qualcomm historically excels in computational photography. The absence of information on sensor sizes and lens apertures makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Magic6 Pro’s chipset gives it a potential advantage in image quality.
Performance
Both phones are powered by 4nm chipsets, but the architectures differ significantly. The vivo X200 FE’s Dimensity 9300+ features a unique core configuration with one Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4 GHz, three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85 GHz, and four Cortex-A720 efficiency cores. The Honor Magic6 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with a single 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 core, three Cortex-A720 cores at 3.2 GHz, two Cortex-A720 cores at 3.0 GHz, and two Cortex-A520 efficiency cores. While the Dimensity 9300+ has more X4 cores, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s optimized architecture and Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU generally provide better sustained performance and thermal management, crucial for extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s integrated AI engine also offers advantages in camera processing and other AI-driven tasks.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 FE offers a commendable 58:09h endurance and a rapid 90W wired charging solution, reaching 100% in just 57 minutes. The Honor Magic6 Pro, while offering a slightly lower active use score of 14:06h, compensates with 80W wired charging, 66W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wireless charging. The X200 FE’s faster wired charging is a clear win for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Magic6 Pro’s wireless charging capabilities add convenience, while the reverse wireless charging can be useful for accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 FE if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds and prioritize peak CPU performance for short bursts, like compiling code or quick video edits. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you prefer a more refined, consistently powerful experience, especially for gaming and demanding applications, and value a brighter, more visible display in direct sunlight.