vivo X20 Plus UD vs Huawei Mate 10 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Huawei Mate 10 Pro edges out the vivo X20 Plus UD thanks to its superior chipset, significantly better battery life, and generally more refined camera system. While the X20 Plus UD's in-display fingerprint was innovative, the Mate 10 Pro offers a more well-rounded and enduring experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X20 Plus UD | Huawei Mate 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, January | 2017, October. Released 2017, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 155.3 x 80.1 x 7.5 mm (6.11 x 3.15 x 0.30 in) | 154.2 x 74.5 x 7.9 mm (6.07 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181.5 g (6.42 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~376 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 106.7 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | OLED, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) | Kirin 970 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 512 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
| OS | Android 7.1.1 (Nougat), Funtouch 3.2 | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 10.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, AF Auxiliary lens | 12 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF, OIS 20 MP B/W, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.7" |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.28µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm, AF |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 22.5W wired, 58% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3900 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Gold, Rose gold | Midnight Blue, Titanium Gray, Mocha Brown, Pink Gold |
| Models | - | BLA-L29, BLA-L09, BLA-AL00, BLA-A09, BLA-TL00 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 450 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinity (nominal), 4.096 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 84dB |
| Performance | - | GeekBench: 6783 (v4.4) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinity (nominal), 4.096 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 84dB |
| Performance | - | GeekBench: 6783 (v4.4) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X20 Plus UD
- Innovative in-display fingerprint sensor
- Slightly more compact design
- Decent camera
- Weaker chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Less impressive camera compared to Mate 10 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
- Exceptional battery life
- Powerful Kirin 970 chipset
- Excellent camera system
- Fast charging
- Great sunlight readability
- Older design
- Software support may be limited
- Potentially larger size
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays with high contrast ratios. The Mate 10 Pro's display is known for its exceptional sunlight readability (4.096 nominal contrast). The X20 Plus UD likely has a slightly more vibrant color profile, but the Mate 10 Pro's outdoor visibility is a significant advantage. Resolution is likely similar, offering sharp visuals.
Camera Comparison
The Mate 10 Pro's camera system is generally considered superior. It features a dual-lens setup with excellent image processing capabilities, particularly in low light. While the X20 Plus UD has a decent camera, it doesn't match the Mate 10 Pro's overall image quality and versatility. The Mate 10 Pro also offered better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Huawei Mate 10 Pro's Kirin 970 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Snapdragon 660 in the vivo X20 Plus UD. The Kirin 970 was a flagship-level chip at its time, offering significantly better CPU and GPU performance. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the Mate 10 Pro.
Battery Life
This is where the Mate 10 Pro truly shines. Its endurance rating of 96 hours is exceptional. The X20 Plus UD's battery life is respectable, but falls far short of the Mate 10 Pro's longevity. The Mate 10 Pro's fast charging (58% in 30 minutes) is also a plus.
Buying Guide
The vivo X20 Plus UD is a good choice for those prioritizing an early in-display fingerprint sensor and a slightly more compact design. The Huawei Mate 10 Pro is ideal for users who demand long battery life, strong performance, and a capable camera, especially if they're looking for a more affordable flagship option now.