vivo X100s vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Android Flagship Performance

The vivo X100s and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone engineering, but they take distinctly different approaches. The X100s champions MediaTek’s latest Dimensity 9300+ chipset, while the Find X7 Ultra leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects these powerhouses, focusing on real-world performance, battery life, and charging capabilities to determine which device best suits demanding users.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly longer battery life, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with a measured 12:47h active use score, provides a more consistent experience, despite the X100s’ impressive peak performance.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X100s Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, May 132024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, May 17Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions163.1 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.31 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight203 g (7.16 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 750
OSAndroid 14, OriginOS 4Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT importLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF-
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASSGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging100W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Ion 5100 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsTitanium, White, Grey, GreenBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsV2359APHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 520 EUR$ 546.64

vivo X100s

  • Potentially higher peak CPU performance due to the Dimensity 9300+’s core configuration.
  • Fast 100W wired charging.
  • Reverse wired charging capability.

  • Battery life is currently unknown and potentially lower than the Oppo.
  • Thermal management may be a concern under sustained load.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Excellent battery life (12:47h active use).
  • Brighter display (1165 nits).
  • 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging.

  • Slightly lower peak CPU clock speed compared to the X100s.
  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 can still generate heat under extreme load.

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1165 nits, making it more legible under direct sunlight compared to the X100s (brightness data unavailable). While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the X7 Ultra’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Bezels are expected to be comparable given both phones’ premium positioning, and color accuracy will likely be excellent on both, though independent testing is needed to confirm.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature advanced camera systems. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra, given Oppo’s history, likely emphasizes computational photography and image processing for vibrant, shareable photos. The X100s may lean towards a more natural, color-accurate representation. Sensor size and OIS implementation will be critical differentiators, but these details are currently unavailable. We can safely assume both will omit truly useful macro lenses, focusing instead on primary, ultrawide, and telephoto capabilities.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) features a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, while the vivo X100s utilizes the Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) with a faster 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4. However, the Dimensity 9300+ also includes *three* additional Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85 GHz, potentially offering a burst of multi-core performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s configuration (1x3.3GHz, 3x3.2GHz, 2x3.0GHz, 2x2.3GHz) prioritizes a more balanced core distribution. The X7 Ultra’s advantage lies in Qualcomm’s established thermal management and optimized software integration, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the real-world impact will depend on implementation.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 12:47h of active use. While the vivo X100s’ battery capacity is unknown, its 100W wired charging (50% in 11 minutes) is comparable to the X7 Ultra’s (50% in 10 minutes, 100% in 26 minutes). The X7 Ultra further adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. The X7 Ultra’s longer battery life offsets any slight charging speed advantage the X100s might have.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X100s if you prioritize raw CPU power for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and appreciate the potential for slightly faster initial charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you value consistent, all-day battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the added convenience of 50W wireless charging. The Find X7 Ultra is the better choice for gamers and multimedia consumers.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 9300+ in the vivo X100s suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chipset, its thermal performance is a key concern. MediaTek chipsets have historically been more prone to throttling than Qualcomm’s Snapdragon counterparts. Independent testing will be crucial to determine if vivo has implemented effective cooling solutions to mitigate this issue. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from Qualcomm’s established thermal management expertise.
❓ How does the 50W wireless charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compare to the 100W wired charging on both phones in terms of convenience for daily use?
While 100W wired charging is faster for a full charge, 50W wireless charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra offers a significant convenience factor. It allows for topping up the battery throughout the day without the need for cables, making it ideal for users who frequently travel or are on the go. The X7 Ultra’s 100% charge in 26 minutes with wired charging is still very competitive.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds (3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz) between the vivo X100s and Oppo Find X7 Ultra noticeable in everyday tasks?
The 0.1 GHz difference in peak CPU clock speed is unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks like browsing, social media, or video playback. The difference will be more apparent in heavily CPU-bound workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, or demanding games. The Dimensity 9300+'s additional X4 cores may provide a more substantial advantage in multi-threaded applications.