vivo X100s Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more refined software experience, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with excellent thermal management, provides a consistently smoother experience, while the 11:25h active use battery score demonstrates impressive endurance. However, the X100s Pro’s 100W charging is a compelling counterpoint.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X100s Pro | Xiaomi 14 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 13 | 2024, February 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 17 | Available. Released 2024, February 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), titanium frame (grade 5) or aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 224 g (7.90 oz) | 219.8 / 224.4 / 229.5 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Xiaomi Shield Glass |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (typ), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps (China model only), 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 33 min 80W wireless, 100% in 46 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5400 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· 5000 mAh (Global)· 5300 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium, White, Grey | Black, Blue, White, Titanium Gray |
| Models | V2324HA | 24031PN0DC, 24030PN60G |
| Price | About 640 EUR | € 663.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.83 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo X100s Pro
- Incredibly fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially higher CPU burst performance with three X4 cores
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ offers strong processing power
- Battery life likely shorter than Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- Software optimization may not be as refined as Xiaomi’s MIUI
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- Excellent battery life (11:25h active use)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides consistent performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Slower wired charging compared to vivo X100s Pro
- MIUI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1281 nits measured, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the X100s Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the 14 Ultra’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The absence of detailed display specs for the X100s Pro makes a comprehensive comparison difficult, but the 14 Ultra’s panel is demonstrably superior in terms of peak luminance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for both devices, a direct comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi’s Ultra series is renowned for its camera prowess, and the 14 Ultra is expected to continue this tradition. The larger sensor size (likely) in the 14 Ultra, combined with Qualcomm’s image signal processor, will likely result in superior dynamic range and low-light performance. The X100s Pro will likely focus on computational photography strengths from vivo, but the 14 Ultra’s hardware advantage is significant. We can assume both will offer excellent image quality, but the 14 Ultra likely has the edge.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) features a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, while the vivo X100s Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) with a faster 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4. However, the Dimensity 9300+ also includes *three* Cortex-X4 cores, potentially offering a burst performance advantage. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s more balanced core configuration (3x A720, 2x A720, 2x A520) suggests better sustained performance and efficiency. The X100s Pro’s CPU architecture, while powerful, may be more prone to thermal throttling under prolonged load. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s integrated NPU likely provides a more efficient AI processing experience.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s 11:25h active use score demonstrates impressive battery endurance. While the X100s Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 100W wired charging (50% in 12 minutes) is significantly faster than the 14 Ultra’s 90W charging (100% in 33 minutes). The 14 Ultra also offers 80W wireless charging (100% in 46 minutes) compared to the X100s Pro’s 50W wireless. The X100s Pro’s faster wired charging is ideal for quick top-ups, but the 14 Ultra’s larger battery and efficient chipset provide longer overall usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X100s Pro if you prioritize incredibly fast charging speeds (100W wired) and are comfortable with MediaTek’s software optimization. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Ultra if you demand consistently high performance across demanding tasks, value a longer-lasting battery, and appreciate a more mature software ecosystem with a focus on camera capabilities.