vivo X100s Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X100s Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 100W charging significantly outperform the S24 Ultra in these areas. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s superior battery life and refined software experience make it a compelling choice for those valuing longevity and a polished user interface.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X100s Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 13 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 17 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 224 g (7.90 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps (China model only), 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5400 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium, White, Grey | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | V2324HA | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 640 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
vivo X100s Pro
- Significantly faster charging (100W)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Battery life potentially lower than S24 Ultra
- Software ecosystem less established than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (13:49h active use)
- Refined software experience with One UI
- Versatile camera system with established reputation
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Chipset performance slightly behind X100s Pro in raw CPU power
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1447 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X100s Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, Samsung’s Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel is renowned for its color accuracy and vibrancy. The S24 Ultra’s adaptive refresh rate (LTPO) likely contributes to better power efficiency, though the X100s Pro may also feature a similar technology. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, but the S24 Ultra’s curved display might offer a slightly more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are expected to deliver excellent image quality, the specifics are crucial. The S24 Ultra’s camera system is known for its versatility, offering multiple lenses and advanced image processing. The X100s Pro’s camera specs are not detailed, but vivo often prioritizes sensor size and computational photography. Without knowing the main sensor size on the X100s Pro, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the S24 Ultra’s established reputation for consistent image quality and video stabilization gives it an edge. We can assume both phones will offer robust low-light performance and advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X100s Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ features a unique CPU configuration with a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, suggesting a focus on sustained high performance. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with its 1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520 cores, offers a more balanced approach. Both are built on a 4nm process, but the Dimensity 9300+'s core configuration hints at superior multi-core performance. The S24 Ultra benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software integration and potentially better thermal management, though the X100s Pro’s aggressive cooling solution could mitigate this.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s 13:49h active use score demonstrates impressive battery life, indicating efficient power management. The vivo X100s Pro compensates for potentially lower battery capacity with its blazing-fast 100W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 12 minutes. The S24 Ultra’s 45W charging, reaching 65% in 30 minutes, is significantly slower. The X100s Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, while the S24 Ultra provides 15W wireless (Qi) and 4.5W reverse wireless. The X100s Pro prioritizes speed, while the S24 Ultra focuses on longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X100s Pro if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and if minimizing charging downtime is critical. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a more balanced experience with exceptional battery life, a versatile camera system, and the seamless integration of Samsung’s software features and ecosystem.