vivo X100s Pro vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance

The vivo X100s Pro and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android flagship design, but they take distinctly different approaches. The X100s Pro champions MediaTek’s latest Dimensity 9300+ chipset, while the Find X7 Ultra relies on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects these key differences, alongside battery life, charging speeds, and display quality, to determine which device reigns supreme.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and slightly better battery endurance, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with a measured 12:47h active use score, provides a more consistently powerful experience. However, the vivo X100s Pro offers a compelling alternative for those invested in the MediaTek ecosystem.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X100s Pro Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, May 132024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, May 17Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.35 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight224 g (7.90 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 750
OSAndroid 14, OriginOS 4Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT importLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF-
Video8K@30fps (China model only), 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASSGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPortUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging100W wired, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless Reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Ion 5400 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsTitanium, White, GreyBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsV2324HAPHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 640 EUR$ 546.64

vivo X100s Pro

  • Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9300+
  • MediaTek ecosystem advantages for some users
  • Fast 100W wired and 50W wireless charging

  • Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
  • Unspecified display brightness and battery capacity
  • Reverse wireless charging details missing

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Superior battery life (12:47h active use)
  • Brighter display (1165 nits)
  • More efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset

  • Slightly lower peak CPU clock speed
  • May lack the raw CPU power of the X100s Pro in specific scenarios
  • Higher price point (likely)

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1165 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the X100s Pro. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the X7 Ultra’s higher peak brightness translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. The absence of detailed display specs for the X100s Pro leaves a gap in the comparison, but Oppo’s panel offers a clear advantage for outdoor use.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands are known for their camera prowess. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is expected to feature a sophisticated multi-camera system, likely with a large main sensor and advanced image stabilization. The X100s Pro will likely leverage MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities. The absence of sensor size details prevents a definitive judgment, but Oppo’s history suggests a focus on computational photography and versatile zoom capabilities.

Performance

The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3.3 GHz Cortex-X4) is a powerhouse, but the vivo X100s Pro’s Dimensity 9300+ (3.4 GHz Cortex-X4) pushes clock speeds even higher. However, the Dimensity 9300+ utilizes three Cortex-X4 cores versus the Snapdragon’s single X4, potentially leading to more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architecture, built on a 4nm process, is optimized for efficiency, while the Dimensity 9300+’s configuration may prioritize peak performance at the cost of sustained efficiency. Both phones feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s integrated AI engine offers advantages in tasks like image processing and on-device machine learning.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 12:47h of active use. While the X100s Pro’s battery capacity is unspecified, the Find X7 Ultra’s endurance suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. Both devices support 100W wired charging, with the Oppo achieving a 50% charge in 10 minutes and a full charge in 26 minutes, slightly faster than the X100s Pro’s 50% in 12 minutes. Both also offer 50W wireless charging, with the Oppo providing 10W reverse wireless charging compared to the X100s Pro’s unspecified reverse wireless capability.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X100s Pro if you prioritize raw CPU power for demanding tasks and appreciate the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+’s architecture. It’s ideal for developers, power users who frequently compile code, or those seeking the absolute fastest single-core performance. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you value consistent, all-day battery life, a brighter display, and a more refined thermal management solution, making it the better choice for gamers and multimedia consumers.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 9300+ in the vivo X100s Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9300+’s aggressive clock speeds and core configuration could lead to thermal throttling during prolonged gaming. While the chip is powerful, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is generally considered more thermally efficient, offering more consistent performance over extended periods.
❓ How does the 100W charging on both phones compare in real-world usage?
Both phones offer incredibly fast 100W wired charging. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is slightly faster, reaching 50% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 26 minutes, while the X100s Pro takes 12 minutes for 50%. This difference, while noticeable, is relatively small and both provide a significant top-up in a short amount of time.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's AI engine in the Oppo Find X7 Ultra noticeable in everyday tasks?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's integrated AI engine enhances features like image processing, scene detection, and voice assistant responsiveness. While not always immediately apparent, it contributes to a smoother and more intelligent user experience, particularly in camera applications and AI-powered features.