vivo X100s Pro vs Huawei Pura 70 Ultra: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the vivo X100s Pro is the better choice. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds, and its 100W wired and 50W wireless charging are competitive. However, the Pura 70 Ultra’s battery life and potentially unique camera processing will appeal to specific users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X100s Pro | Huawei Pura 70 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | SA/NSA - China only |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 13 | 2024, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 17 | Available. Released 2024, April 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 224 g (7.90 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Kunlun Glass (Basalt-tempered) |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1260 x 2844 pixels (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, HDR, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.18 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Kirin 9010 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | - |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | EMUI 14.2 (International), HarmonyOS 4.2 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6-4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS, retractable lens 50 MP, f/2.1, 90mm (telephoto), PDAF (5cm - ∞), OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps (China model only), 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | Yes, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired 80W wireless 20W reverse wireless 18W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5400 mAh | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium, White, Grey | Black, White, Brown, Green |
| Models | V2324HA | HBP-LX9, HBP-AL00 |
| Price | About 640 EUR | € 1,239.99 |
vivo X100s Pro
- Significantly faster processor with Dimensity 9300+
- Competitive 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Battery life is unknown and may be less than Pura 70 Ultra
- Camera processing style may not appeal to all users
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
- Excellent battery life (12:29h active use)
- High peak display brightness (1231 nits)
- Versatile charging options (80W wireless, reverse charging)
- Older Kirin 9010 chipset offers lower performance
- 7nm process may lead to more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1231 nits, making it highly visible outdoors. While the X100s Pro’s peak brightness isn’t specified, the Pura 70 Ultra has a clear advantage in direct sunlight. Both devices likely employ high refresh rate OLED panels, but the Pura 70 Ultra’s brightness is a quantifiable advantage. The absence of PWM frequency data for both phones makes it difficult to assess flicker-related eye strain, but users sensitive to flicker should investigate further.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Pura 70 Ultra’s Ultra designation suggests a focus on camera capabilities. Both phones likely feature advanced image processing algorithms, but Huawei’s history suggests a preference for vibrant, sometimes oversaturated, images. The X100s Pro’s image processing is likely more natural. The absence of sensor size information makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but larger sensors generally perform better in challenging conditions. The Pura 70 Ultra’s variable aperture is a potential advantage for creative control.
Performance
The vivo X100s Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra’s Kirin 9010 (7nm). The Dimensity 9300+ features a unique CPU configuration with Cortex-X4 cores clocked up to 3.4 GHz, promising substantially faster processing speeds. The 7nm Kirin 9010, while capable, is older technology and will struggle to match the X100s Pro in demanding tasks. The Dimensity 9300+’s 4nm process also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X100s Pro is expected to excel in benchmarks and real-world performance.
Battery Life
The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 12:29h in active use. While the X100s Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Pura 70 Ultra’s endurance is a strong point. Both phones support 100W wired charging, but the X100s Pro adds 50W wireless charging, while the Pura 70 Ultra offers 80W wireless. The Pura 70 Ultra also offers 20W reverse wired and 18W reverse wireless charging, providing more versatility for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X100s Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, or future software updates. Its cutting-edge chipset and fast charging are ideal for power users. Buy the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra if you prioritize long battery life, a potentially more refined camera experience (depending on preference), and are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem and its software approach.