vivo X100 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: Which Android Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around capability and a mature ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra remains the safer bet. However, the vivo X100’s blistering 120W charging and potentially superior CPU performance, thanks to the Dimensity 9300, make it a compelling alternative for those seeking raw speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X100 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 13 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 21 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5 mm or 8.8 mm | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, White, Orange | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | V2309A, V2308 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | ₹ 51,999 | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
vivo X100
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially superior multi-core CPU performance with the Dimensity 9300
- Aggressive CPU core configuration for demanding tasks
- Software ecosystem less mature than Samsung’s
- Battery capacity and overall battery life are unknown
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (13:49h active use)
- Mature software ecosystem and long-term support
- Best-in-class camera system with versatile features
- Slower 45W wired charging compared to the X100
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 may be slightly less performant in specific multi-threaded workloads
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1447 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X100’s display specs aren’t provided, Samsung’s panel technology and brightness advantage are significant. The S24 Ultra likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to battery efficiency. The S24 Ultra’s display is also known for its color accuracy, a crucial factor for content creators. The X100 will need to deliver comparable color science to compete.
Camera Comparison
The S24 Ultra’s camera system is a known quantity, renowned for its versatility and image processing. While specific sensor details are missing for the X100, the focus should be on the main sensor’s size and aperture. The S24 Ultra’s image processing prioritizes detail and dynamic range, while vivo often leans towards more vibrant, social media-friendly aesthetics. The S24 Ultra’s video capabilities are also a strong point, with advanced stabilization and recording options. The X100 will need to demonstrate a compelling photographic advantage to challenge Samsung’s established camera prowess.
Performance
Both devices utilize a 4nm process, but the CPU architectures differ. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the S24 Ultra features a 1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, while the Dimensity 9300 in the X100 employs a 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, alongside *three* additional Cortex-X4 cores. This configuration suggests the X100 could excel in multi-threaded workloads. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s GPU is likely more mature and optimized for gaming. The S24 Ultra’s LPDDR5x RAM complements the Snapdragon, while the X100’s RAM specification is unknown. Thermal management will be critical; the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s efficiency gains should mitigate throttling, but the X100’s aggressive CPU core count could generate more heat.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra delivers an impressive 13:49h of active use, showcasing excellent battery life. The vivo X100 compensates with its 120W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 11 minutes – a significant advantage over the S24 Ultra’s 45W charging (65% in 30 minutes). While the X100’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging speed mitigates concerns about smaller capacity. The S24 Ultra also offers 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless, features also present (with reverse wired charging) on the X100, but at different wattages.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X100 if you prioritize incredibly fast charging – reaching 50% in just 11 minutes – and are willing to explore a less mainstream software experience for potentially higher CPU performance in demanding tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you value a polished, feature-rich ecosystem, exceptional battery life (13:49h active use), and a best-in-class camera system with extensive software support.