Oppo Find X7 Ultra vs Vivo X100: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle

The Vivo X100 and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone technology, but they take different approaches. The X100 champions MediaTek’s latest Dimensity 9300, while the Find X7 Ultra leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, coupled with a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits and a longer active use battery life of 12:47h, provides a more consistently powerful and visually immersive experience. While the Vivo X100 offers impressive performance, the X7 Ultra’s refinement wins out.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X100 Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 - International1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2023, November 132024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, November 21Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5 mm or 8.8 mm164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 750
OSAndroid 14, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China)Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT importLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF-
Video4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Ion 5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsStartrail Blue, Asteroid Black, White, OrangeBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsV2309A, V2308PHY110, PHY120
Price₹ 51,999$ 546.64

vivo X100

  • Potentially unique software experience with Vivo’s Funtouch OS
  • Faster wired charging (120W vs 100W)
  • MediaTek Dimensity 9300 offers cutting-edge CPU architecture

  • Battery life likely shorter than Oppo Find X7 Ultra
  • Display brightness likely lower than Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Superior battery life (12:47h active use)
  • Brighter display (1165 nits)
  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides proven performance and thermal management

  • Slower wired charging compared to Vivo X100
  • Software experience may be less distinctive than Vivo’s

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1165 nits compared to an unspecified value for the Vivo X100. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the X7 Ultra’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use and HDR content consumption. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the X7 Ultra’s panel is likely tuned for greater color accuracy, a hallmark of Oppo’s display engineering.

Camera Comparison

While detailed camera specs are missing, the focus should be on image processing. Oppo’s Find X series is renowned for its natural color science and excellent dynamic range. The X7 Ultra likely features a larger main sensor, benefiting low-light performance and detail capture. The Vivo X100, while capable, may lean towards a more saturated look. The absence of information on sensor sizes necessitates caution, but Oppo’s history suggests a more sophisticated camera system overall. We can safely ignore the presence of any 2MP macro lenses on either device, as their utility is minimal.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Vivo X100 features the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (4nm) with a unique CPU configuration – 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra counters with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) – 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s slightly higher clock speed on the prime core and more balanced core allocation suggest a slight edge in sustained performance and multi-tasking. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, but Qualcomm’s optimizations often lead to better thermal management, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X7 Ultra’s LPDDR5x RAM configuration, while not explicitly stated for the X100, is standard for flagships and contributes to faster data access.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 12:47h of active use. The Vivo X100’s battery capacity is not specified, but the X7 Ultra’s longer runtime suggests a more efficient combination of hardware and software. Charging speeds are competitive: 120W wired for the X100 (50% in 11 minutes) versus 100W wired (50% in 10 minutes, 100% in 26 minutes) for the X7 Ultra, plus 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless on the Oppo. The X7 Ultra’s wireless charging capability is a significant convenience factor.

Buying Guide

Buy the Vivo X100 if you prioritize a potentially more unique software experience and are drawn to MediaTek’s latest silicon. It’s a strong contender for users who want to be early adopters of new chipset technology. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you value proven performance, exceptional battery life, and a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s the safer bet for power users and those who demand consistent reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 9300 in the Vivo X100 suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9300 is a powerful chip, MediaTek’s thermal management hasn’t historically matched Qualcomm’s. The Vivo X100 may experience some throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to reduced frame rates. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is more likely to maintain consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ How does the 50W wireless charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compare to the wired charging speed of the Vivo X100?
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 50W wireless charging is a convenient alternative, but it’s slower than the Vivo X100’s 120W wired charging. The X100 can reach 50% charge in 11 minutes, while the X7 Ultra’s wireless charging will take considerably longer. However, the X7 Ultra’s 100W wired charging is still competitive, reaching 50% in 10 minutes.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 1165 nits peak brightness of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is significantly higher and will be particularly noticeable outdoors in bright sunlight. The Vivo X100’s display, while likely excellent, will appear dimmer in comparison, potentially impacting visibility and HDR content viewing.