vivo X Note vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Detailed Flagship Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance uplift, coupled with substantially faster 120W charging. While the X Note offers a compelling experience, the 13 Pro’s advancements in speed and efficiency are hard to ignore.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Note | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 11 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 15 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 80.3 x 8.4 mm (6.65 x 3.16 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 216 / 221 g (7.62 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3080 pixels (~486 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 121.3 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.2µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gray | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | V2170A | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 870 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Note
- Balanced feature set
- Mature software experience (likely)
- Competent camera system (assumed)
- Older Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Slower charging speeds (80W wired)
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display
- Potential for software quirks (Xiaomi's MIUI)
- May run hotter under sustained load (though mitigated by Gen 2 efficiency)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1253 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the X Note. While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, the 13 Pro’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior implementation of black levels. The X Note’s display characteristics are less defined in the provided data, making a direct comparison difficult beyond assuming a high-quality AMOLED experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. However, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 likely provides superior image processing capabilities, including better noise reduction and dynamic range. The absence of details on the X Note’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its strengths beyond assuming a flagship-level experience.
Performance
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a substantial leap over the vivo X Note’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X2 – and faster clock speeds (3.2 GHz vs 3.0 GHz). This translates to noticeable gains in both single-core and multi-core performance. Furthermore, the Gen 2’s improved 4nm process offers better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Xiaomi 13 Pro also benefits from a more modern memory configuration, likely LPDDR5X, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes, significantly faster than the vivo X Note’s 80W charging (32 minutes). While both offer 50W wireless charging (36 minutes for Xiaomi, unspecified for vivo), the wired charging speed is a major differentiator. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s endurance rating of 115 hours matches the X Note’s, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the faster charging. This indicates efficient power management on the Xiaomi 13 Pro, offsetting the higher power draw of its more powerful chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Note if you prioritize a more mature software experience and a balanced feature set without necessarily needing the absolute fastest performance. It’s a strong contender for users who value a refined, all-around flagship. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you demand the latest and greatest in processing power, lightning-fast charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display. This phone is geared towards power users, gamers, and those who frequently capture photos and videos.