vivo X Note vs. Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X6 Pro emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers a noticeable performance uplift, coupled with a brighter, more efficient display and comparable charging speeds. While the X Note remains a capable device, the Find X6 Pro’s advancements justify its position as the flagship leader.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Note | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 11 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 15 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 80.3 x 8.4 mm (6.65 x 3.16 x 0.33 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 216 / 221 g (7.62 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3080 pixels (~486 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 121.3 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.2µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gray | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | V2170A | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 870 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Note
- Potentially lower price point due to age
- Mature and refined software experience
- Reliable Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- Older chipset with less processing power
- Slower charging speeds compared to the Find X6 Pro
- Likely less advanced display technology
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Significantly brighter and more efficient display
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- May require a software adjustment period for some users
- Potential for early adopter bugs (though Oppo is generally stable)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the X Note. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. Both devices likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life, but the Find X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a more immersive viewing experience. While the X Note’s display quality is undoubtedly excellent, the Find X6 Pro sets a new benchmark for mobile display technology.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as photography powerhouses, but specifics beyond 'Photo/Video' capabilities are limited. However, given Oppo’s history, the Find X6 Pro likely features a more advanced image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s improved ISP (Image Signal Processor) further enhances the Find X6 Pro’s photographic capabilities. While the X Note undoubtedly captures excellent images, the Find X6 Pro’s newer hardware and software suggest superior low-light performance, dynamic range, and overall image quality. The absence of details on sensor sizes makes a definitive comparison difficult, but Oppo’s focus on camera innovation gives it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the vivo X Note’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X2 – and faster clock speeds (3.2 GHz vs 3.0 GHz). This results in faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Gen 2 also benefits from architectural improvements in the GPU, offering a more efficient and powerful graphics experience. While both phones utilize LPDDR5x RAM, the Gen 2’s overall system-on-chip (SoC) efficiency translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under heavy load.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the performance differences. However, the Oppo Find X6 Pro’s 100W wired charging (45% in 10 minutes, 100% in 30 minutes) is significantly faster than the X Note’s 80W charging (100% in 32 minutes). The Find X6 Pro also charges faster wirelessly (50% in 22 minutes, 100% in 51 minutes) compared to the X Note’s 50W wireless charging. This faster charging capability is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Note if you prioritize a proven, reliable experience and are seeking a flagship at a potentially lower price point as it ages. It’s ideal for users who value a balanced feature set without needing the absolute latest in processing power. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you demand the best possible performance, a stunning display, and are willing to invest in the latest technology. This phone is geared towards power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts.