vivo X Note vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X Note is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro excels in camera versatility and offers a smoother, more integrated software experience, making it ideal for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Note | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 11 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 15 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 80.3 x 8.4 mm (6.65 x 3.16 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 216 / 221 g (7.62 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3080 pixels (~486 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 121.3 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.2µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gray | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | V2170A | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 870 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Note
- Significantly faster charging (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Potentially higher raw CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 may be prone to thermal throttling
- Limited information on display specifications
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera image processing and software features
- Brighter display with infinite contrast ratio
- Power-efficient Tensor G2 chip
- Slow charging speeds (23W wired, 23W wireless)
- Relies heavily on software for camera performance
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1090 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo X Note’s display specifications aren’t provided, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The lack of detailed display specs for the X Note makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s measured brightness gives it a clear advantage in outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped for excellent photo and video capture, but their approaches differ. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s renowned computational photography, enhancing images through software algorithms. The vivo X Note, while details are limited, likely relies on its hardware capabilities and vivo’s image processing. Without specific sensor size or aperture information for the X Note, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the Pixel 7 Pro. The Pixel 7 Pro’s strength lies in its consistent image quality and features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur, powered by the Tensor G2’s AI capabilities. The X Note’s camera system is likely competitive, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s software advantage is significant.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X Note utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz. The Pixel 7 Pro, however, is powered by Google’s Tensor G2 (5nm). The 5nm process of the Tensor G2 generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling compared to the 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, despite the Snapdragon’s higher clock speeds. The Pixel 7 Pro’s CPU configuration, with two Cortex-X1 cores at 2.85 GHz, is optimized for AI tasks, complementing Google’s software features. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers raw CPU power, the Tensor G2’s focus on machine learning provides a different, and arguably more impactful, performance profile for Pixel users.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, their charging capabilities are drastically different. The vivo X Note supports 80W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in just 32 minutes, and 50W wireless charging. The Pixel 7 Pro is limited to 23W wired charging (PD3.0) taking 30 minutes to reach 50%, and 23W wireless charging. This makes the vivo X Note significantly faster to charge, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The X Note also offers 10W reverse wireless charging, a feature also present on the Pixel 7 Pro, allowing it to charge other devices wirelessly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Note if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a camera-first experience with exceptional image processing, a clean Android interface, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google.