vivo X Fold+ vs. Oppo Find N3 Flip: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the vivo X Fold+ is the better choice. However, the Oppo Find N3 Flip excels in battery life, offering nearly two days of typical use, making it ideal for those who value longevity over peak speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold+ | Oppo Find N3 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4730 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | V2229A | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | About 1450 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
vivo X Fold+
- Faster 80W wired charging for quick top-ups.
- Potentially higher sustained performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
- Larger form factor may be preferred for multitasking.
- Battery life likely inferior to the Oppo Find N3 Flip.
- No specific battery capacity information provided.
- Larger size may be less pocketable.
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- Exceptional battery life with 12:58h active use and 92h endurance.
- Compact flip-phone form factor for portability.
- 939 nits peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Slower 44W wired charging.
- Dimensity 9200 may throttle under sustained load.
- Smaller cover display may limit functionality.
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a measured peak brightness of 939 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display outdoors. While the X Fold+’s display specs aren’t provided, vivo typically employs high-quality panels. The N3 Flip’s flip-phone form factor inherently offers a smaller external display for quick glances, a feature absent on the larger, book-style X Fold+. The absence of refresh rate data for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but LTPO technology would be a significant advantage for power efficiency on either.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s camera is described as 'Photo / Video', indicating a versatile setup. The X Fold+’s camera details are missing, but vivo often emphasizes image processing and computational photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the absence of mention of a high-resolution sensor on the N3 Flip suggests a focus on image quality through software rather than sheer megapixel count.
Performance
The vivo X Fold+ leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.19 GHz. This architecture prioritizes sustained performance. Conversely, the Oppo Find N3 Flip utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (4nm), with a Cortex-X3 core at 3.05 GHz. While the X3 core is newer, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s proven thermal management and optimized software integration often translate to more consistent frame rates in demanding games. The Dimensity 9200’s A715 cores offer efficiency gains, but the X Fold+’s overall system performance is likely higher.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N3 Flip shines in battery life, achieving an active use score of 12:58h and an endurance rating of 92h. This is a significant advantage over the X Fold+, whose battery capacity and endurance are not specified. The N3 Flip’s 44W wired charging, reaching 50% in 23 minutes, is slower than the X Fold+’s 80W charging (100% in 35 minutes). However, the N3 Flip’s superior battery life mitigates the slower charging speed, while the X Fold+ relies on its faster charging to compensate for potentially higher power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Fold+ if you need a foldable with uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and if rapid 80W charging is a priority. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prefer a more compact, everyday-carry foldable with exceptional battery life and a focus on streamlined usability, even if it means sacrificing some processing headroom.