vivo X Fold+ vs. Huawei Mate X3: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X Fold+ emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its significantly faster 80W wired charging and 50W wireless charging provide a substantial convenience advantage over the Mate X3’s 66W and 50W respectively, offsetting the identical core performance. While both offer excellent battery endurance, the X Fold+’s charging speed makes it the more practical daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold+ | Huawei Mate X3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm | Unfolded: 156.9 x 141.5 x 5.3 mmFolded: 156.9 x 72.4 x 11.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 239 g or 241 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | IPX8 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Kunlun Glass (cover display only) |
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 2224 x 2496 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 197.5 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| - | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2504 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | HarmonyOS 3.1 (China), EMUI 13.1 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (B1I+B1c+B2a), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter |
| - | BDS Satellite Message | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 66W wired 50W wireless 7.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4730 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 4800 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5060 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black, White, Violet, Dark Green, Gold |
| Models | V2229A | ALT-AL00, ALT-L29 |
| Price | About 1450 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 993592 (v9) GeekBench: 4283 (v5.5), 4512 (v6) GFXBench: 41fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Fold+
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Faster 50W wireless charging
- 5G connectivity (full Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Potentially more convenient charging ecosystem
- Display peak brightness data unavailable
- Camera specifications largely unknown
Huawei Mate X3
- High measured display brightness (926 nits)
- Excellent battery endurance (81h)
- Potentially refined software experience (region dependent)
- Efficient power management
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower 66W wired charging
- Slower 7.5W reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both foldables utilize large, immersive displays, but the Huawei Mate X3 boasts a measured peak brightness of 926 nits, suggesting a potentially more visible outdoor experience compared to the X Fold+, where peak brightness data is unavailable. While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the real-world difference will likely hinge on color calibration and viewing angles, data for which is currently limited. The absence of refresh rate information for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but both are expected to offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both the vivo X Fold+ and Huawei Mate X3 are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). This makes a meaningful camera comparison impossible based on the provided data. Huawei historically excels in computational photography, but without knowing the sensor specifications, it’s impossible to determine if this advantage translates to the Mate X3. The absence of information regarding video recording capabilities (resolution, frame rates) further hinders a comprehensive assessment.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). Critically, the Mate X3 utilizes a 4G variant of this chipset, limiting its 5G connectivity. Both CPUs share the same core configuration – 1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 – meaning raw processing power will be nearly identical. However, the 4G limitation on the Mate X3 is a significant drawback for users in areas with robust 5G infrastructure. Thermal management will be key to sustained performance, and without specific cooling system details, it’s difficult to predict which device will throttle less under heavy load.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage scenarios. However, the charging capabilities are where a significant difference emerges. The vivo X Fold+ supports 80W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes, alongside 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging. The Huawei Mate X3, in contrast, offers 66W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, and a slower 7.5W reverse wireless charging. This faster charging speed on the X Fold+ provides a substantial convenience advantage, especially for users who frequently deplete their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Fold+ if you prioritize rapid charging and a consistently fast user experience. Its 80W wired charging is a game-changer for power users. Buy the Huawei Mate X3 if you value a potentially slightly more refined software experience (depending on region and preference) and are less concerned with minimizing charging times. The Mate X3’s endurance rating suggests efficient power management, but the slower charging is a trade-off.