vivo X Fold5 vs Google Pixel Fold: A Deep Dive into Foldable Power and AI
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and fast charging, the vivo X Fold5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 and slower charging speeds. However, the Pixel Fold’s software experience and unique design may appeal to Google ecosystem enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold5 | Google Pixel Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 25 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 02 | Available. Released 2023, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (closed), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 159.7 x 142.3 x 4.3 mmFolded: 159.7 x 72.6 x 9.2 mm | Unfolded: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mmFolded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 217 g or 226 g (7.65 oz) | 283 g (9.98 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2200 x 2480 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1840 x 2208 pixels (~378 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 183.3 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 5280Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | Foldable OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| - | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.8 inches, 1080 x 2092 pixels, 17.4:9 ratio, 408 ppi 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.1, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/3.6", 0.7µm Cover camera: 20 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/3.6", 0.7µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 9.5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Display Port | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired 5W reverse wireless | Wired, PD3.0 Wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4821 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gray, Green, White | Porcelain, Obsidian |
| Models | V2436A, V2429 | G9FPL |
| Price | ₹ 149,998 | € 670.87 / $ 389.26 / £ 899.99 |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X Fold5
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor
- 80W wired charging for rapid replenishment
- Higher peak display brightness for outdoor visibility
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel Fold
- Potential for larger size and weight due to powerful hardware
Google Pixel Fold
- Seamless Google software experience and AI features
- Potentially more compact and ergonomic design
- Strong computational photography capabilities
- Slower Tensor G2 processor compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Slower charging speeds
- May exhibit thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The vivo X Fold5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1916 nits, exceeding typical foldable displays and ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Pixel Fold’s display quality is also high, it likely falls short of this peak brightness. Both devices utilize foldable OLED panels, but details regarding refresh rates and LTPO technology are missing for the Pixel Fold. The X Fold5’s higher brightness translates to a superior viewing experience for outdoor users and content consumers.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for both devices, a direct comparison is limited. However, given Google’s computational photography prowess, the Pixel Fold likely excels in image processing and software-driven enhancements. The X Fold5, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP, should offer strong image quality, but may rely less on software trickery. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures makes it difficult to assess low-light performance or zoom capabilities. We can assume both phones will offer versatile camera systems, but the Pixel Fold’s strength lies in its AI-powered image optimization.
Performance
The vivo X Fold5’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset is a significant leap ahead of the Google Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s octa-core configuration – featuring a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.3 GHz – delivers substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The Tensor G2, while optimized for AI tasks, lags behind in raw processing power. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding applications like gaming and video rendering, where the X Fold5 will maintain higher frame rates and smoother performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The vivo X Fold5 demonstrates a strong battery performance with 13:21 hours of active use, suggesting efficient power management despite its powerful chipset. While the Pixel Fold’s battery capacity is unknown, the X Fold5’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Pixel Fold’s unspecified wired charging (PD3.0). The X Fold5 also supports 40W wireless charging and reverse wired/wireless charging, offering greater flexibility. The combination of longer battery life and faster charging gives the X Fold5 a clear advantage for users who demand all-day power and quick replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Fold5 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value incredibly fast charging. You’ll benefit from a more powerful processor and a battery that lasts a full day with heavy use. Buy the Google Pixel Fold if you prioritize a seamless Google software experience, a more compact external display, and are heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. The Pixel Fold offers a unique foldable experience focused on usability and AI features.