vivo X Fold3 vs Oppo Find N3 Flip: A Deep Dive into Foldable Power and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and demanding tasks, the vivo X Fold3 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a noticeable edge in processing power. However, the Oppo Find N3 Flip excels in battery life and offers a compelling package for everyday use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold3 | Oppo Find N3 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 26 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 03 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Carbon fiber hinge | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160 x 142.7 x 4.7 mmFolded: 160 x 72.7 x 10.2 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2200 x 2480 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, (telephoto), 1/2.93", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired Reverse wired | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | V2337A, V2303A | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | About 900 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
vivo X Fold3
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Potential for better gaming performance
- Likely higher power consumption
- Battery life potentially lower than Oppo
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- Exceptional battery life (12:58h active use)
- Compact foldable design
- Respectable 44W fast charging
- Less powerful Dimensity 9200 chipset
- Slower charging compared to vivo
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a measured peak brightness of 939 nits, a strong figure for outdoor visibility. While the X Fold3’s display specs are currently unavailable, vivo typically employs high-quality panels. The N3 Flip’s foldable design is a key differentiator, offering a unique form factor. Without knowing the X Fold3’s panel technology (LTPO or not), it’s difficult to assess power efficiency. However, the N3 Flip’s brightness is a concrete advantage in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for both devices are limited. However, the focus should be on the main sensors and image processing. Without knowing the sensor sizes or apertures, it’s hard to make a definitive statement. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s camera is marketed for both photo and video, suggesting a balanced approach. The X Fold3’s camera capabilities are currently unknown, but vivo often emphasizes computational photography. We’ll need to see sample images to assess real-world performance and image quality.
Performance
The vivo X Fold3’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) chipset is a significant advantage. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, promises superior performance compared to the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (4nm). While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 generally exhibits better sustained performance and GPU capabilities. The Dimensity 9200’s CPU configuration (3.05 GHz Cortex-X3) is slightly slower, and its Cortex-A510 cores run at 1.80 GHz versus the X Fold3’s 2.0 GHz, impacting multi-threaded workloads. This translates to faster app loading, smoother gaming, and quicker video rendering on the vivo.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N3 Flip shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:58h and an endurance rating of 92h. This suggests excellent power efficiency. The vivo X Fold3’s battery capacity is unknown, but its more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset will likely consume more power. The N3 Flip’s 44W wired charging, reaching 50% in 23 minutes, is respectable, but the X Fold3’s 80W wired charging offers significantly faster top-ups. The trade-off is clear: longer runtime with the Oppo, faster charging with the vivo.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Fold3 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking. Its powerful chipset and 80W charging are ideal for power users. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prioritize all-day battery life, a more compact form factor, and a stylish design. It’s the better choice for users who value portability and efficiency over raw horsepower.