vivo X Fold3 vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the vivo X Fold3 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a performance edge, and 80W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Motorola Razr+ 2025’s impressive 10:12 active use battery score makes it a strong contender for those prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold3 | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 26 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 03 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Carbon fiber hinge | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160 x 142.7 x 4.7 mmFolded: 160 x 72.7 x 10.2 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2200 x 2480 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, (telephoto), 1/2.93", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired Reverse wired | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | V2337A, V2303A | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 900 EUR | $ 500.00 |
vivo X Fold3
- Faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor for demanding tasks
- 80W wired charging for rapid power-ups
- Likely superior image processing capabilities (based on vivo's history)
- Potential for higher thermal throttling under sustained load
- Battery life may be shorter than the Razr+ 2025
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Excellent 10:12 hour active use battery life
- More efficient Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Slightly less powerful processor compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Slower 45W wired charging
Display Comparison
While specific display specs are missing, both devices are expected to feature foldable OLED panels. The X Fold3, given vivo’s history, likely prioritizes color accuracy and peak brightness. The Razr+ 2025, focusing on efficiency, may opt for a slightly less power-hungry panel. The key difference will likely be hinge design and crease visibility, areas where Motorola has historically excelled. Expect both to utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, maximizing battery life.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, both manufacturers typically equip their flagships with capable camera systems. The X Fold3, given vivo’s camera expertise, likely emphasizes image processing and computational photography. The Razr+ 2025 may focus on natural-looking images with accurate color reproduction. Sensor size will be a critical factor; a larger sensor generally captures more light and detail. Expect both to offer OIS on the main sensor, but the aperture and sensor technology will determine low-light performance.
Performance
The core battle lies in the chipsets. The vivo X Fold3’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, offering substantial processing power. The Motorola Razr+ 2025 counters with the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.0 GHz. While the X3 is clocked higher, the X4 architecture represents an improvement in IPC (Instructions Per Clock). The Razr+’s 4x A720 cores versus the X Fold3’s 2x A715 and 2x A710 cores suggest a focus on sustained multi-core performance. The 8s Gen 3’s efficiency gains will likely translate to better thermal management during prolonged use, potentially mitigating throttling. The X Fold3 will likely excel in burst performance, while the Razr+ aims for consistent performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s 10:12 hour active use score is a significant advantage, indicating excellent battery optimization. The vivo X Fold3’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 80W wired charging is a major selling point, potentially achieving a full charge in under 40 minutes. The Razr+ 2025 offers 45W wired and 15W wireless charging, which are slower but still convenient. The 5W reverse wired charging on both devices is useful for topping up accessories, but not a primary charging method. The X Fold3’s faster charging could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity for users who frequently need to top up.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Fold3 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of extremely fast 80W wired charging. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you prioritize all-day battery life and a more efficient chipset, even if it means slightly slower charging and a modest performance trade-off. The Razr+ is ideal for users who heavily rely on their phone throughout the day without frequent access to power outlets.