vivo X Fold3 vs. Huawei Mate X3: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships

The foldable phone market is maturing, with the vivo X Fold3 and Huawei Mate X3 representing two distinct approaches to the form factor. The X Fold3 arrives with a newer chipset and faster charging, while the Mate X3 boasts a proven endurance rating and established foldable design. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the vivo X Fold3 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Mate X3’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Mate X3 offers wireless charging, the X Fold3’s 80W wired charging is substantially faster.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X Fold3 Huawei Mate X3
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA-
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2024, March 262023, March 23
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, April 03Available. Released 2023, April 08
Body
BuildCarbon fiber hingeGlass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 160 x 142.7 x 4.7 mmFolded: 160 x 72.7 x 10.2 mmUnfolded: 156.9 x 141.5 x 5.3 mmFolded: 156.9 x 72.4 x 11.1 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight219 g (7.72 oz)239 g or 241 g (8.43 oz)
 -IPX8 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
Protection-Kunlun Glass (cover display only)
Resolution2200 x 2480 pixels (~413 ppi density)2224 x 2496 pixels (~426 ppi density)
Size8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio)7.85 inches, 197.5 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak)Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz
 -Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2504 pixels
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 730
OSAndroid 14, OriginOS 4HarmonyOS 3.1 (China), EMUI 13.1 (Europe), no Google Play Services
Memory
Card slotNoNano Memory (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
 -UFS
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, (telephoto), 1/2.93", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", PDAF50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide)8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (B1I+B1c+B2a), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter
 -BDS Satellite Message
Battery
Charging80W wired Reverse wired66W wired 50W wireless 7.5W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 5500 mAhMarket-dependent versions:· Li-Po 4800 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5060 mAh (China only)
Misc
ColorsBlack, WhiteBlack, White, Violet, Dark Green, Gold
ModelsV2337A, V2303AALT-AL00, ALT-L29
PriceAbout 900 EURAbout 1500 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 81h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.3 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 993592 (v9) GeekBench: 4283 (v5.5), 4512 (v6) GFXBench: 41fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo X Fold3

  • Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
  • Faster wired charging (80W)
  • Potentially better thermal management

  • Battery capacity currently unknown
  • Detailed camera specs unavailable

Huawei Mate X3

  • Proven 81-hour endurance rating
  • Wireless charging support
  • Established foldable design

  • Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
  • Slower wired charging (66W)

Display Comparison

The Huawei Mate X3’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 926 nits, a respectable figure, but the X Fold3’s panel specifications are currently unavailable. Given vivo’s focus on display quality, it’s reasonable to expect comparable or superior brightness. Both devices feature foldable displays, but without refresh rate or panel technology details for the X Fold3, a direct comparison is limited. The Mate X3’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is a marketing term; real-world contrast performance will depend on the panel’s black levels.

Camera Comparison

Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor sizes, aperture values, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. However, given the current smartphone market trends, it’s likely the X Fold3 will feature a more advanced camera system, potentially with larger sensors and improved computational photography algorithms. The absence of specific camera details on both sides limits a detailed analysis.

Performance

The vivo X Fold3’s Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a clear generational leap over the Huawei Mate X3’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, offers improved single-core performance compared to the Mate X3’s 3.19 GHz Cortex-X2. Furthermore, the 8 Gen 2’s more efficient 4nm process should result in better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Mate X3’s CPU configuration (1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, 4x Cortex-A510) is slightly different from the X Fold3’s (1x Cortex-X3, 2x Cortex-A715, 2x Cortex-A710, 3x Cortex-A510), with the X Fold3 benefiting from newer Cortex-A715 cores.

Battery Life

The Huawei Mate X3 boasts an endurance rating of 81 hours, a strong indicator of its battery life. However, the vivo X Fold3’s battery capacity is unknown. The X Fold3 compensates with significantly faster charging: 80W wired, compared to the Mate X3’s 66W wired and 50W wireless. This means the X Fold3 can potentially replenish its battery much quicker, even if its capacity is slightly lower. The Mate X3 also offers 7.5W reverse wireless charging, a feature also present on the X Fold3, but the faster wired charging of the X Fold3 is a key advantage.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X Fold3 if you prioritize raw performance, future-proofing, and rapid charging speeds. It’s ideal for power users, gamers, and those who demand the latest technology. Buy the Huawei Mate X3 if you value a proven track record of battery endurance and prefer the convenience of wireless charging, and are less concerned with having the absolute fastest processor.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Mate X3 exhibit significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to throttle under sustained load, particularly in less well-cooled devices. While the Mate X3’s foldable design may offer some thermal dissipation benefits, it’s likely to experience more throttling than the X Fold3 with its more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the vivo X Fold3 compare to the 66W charging on the Mate X3 in real-world usage?
80W charging will significantly reduce charge times. Expect a 0-100% charge on the X Fold3 to be noticeably faster – potentially 30-45 minutes – compared to the Mate X3, which will likely take closer to an hour or more.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, what can we infer about the image quality differences between these two phones?
Without sensor details, it's difficult to say. However, newer flagship phones generally benefit from improved image processing algorithms and larger sensors, suggesting the X Fold3 may offer better low-light performance and dynamic range.