vivo X Fold2 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold: The Ultimate Folding Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold2 takes the crown with its significantly brighter display, superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, and blazing-fast charging. While the Phantom V Fold offers a compelling price point, the X Fold2's overall refinement and power make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 28 | Available. Released 2023, April 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front folded (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 161.3 x 143.4 x 6 mmFolded: 161.3 x 73.4 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 159.4 x 140.4 x 6.9 mmFolded: 159.4 x 72 x 14.2-14.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 279 g (9.84 oz) | 299 g (10.55 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 2000 x 2296 pixels (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 196.9 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO4 AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1800 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (peak) 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | Cover display: LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 6.42 inches, 1080 x 2550 pixels, 431 PPI | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 108˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Dual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 55 min |
| Type | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black, White |
| Models | V2266A | AD10 |
| Price | About 1330 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 999348 (v9) GeekBench: 3963 (v5.1), 3748 (v6) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Fold2
- Significantly brighter display
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Premium build quality
- Likely better camera processing
- Higher price
- Availability may be limited in some regions
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- More affordable
- Foldable form factor at a lower price point
- Decent battery life
- Good overall design
- Dimmer display
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 9000+)
- Potentially less refined software experience
Display Comparison
The vivo X Fold2 boasts a stunning 1308 nits peak brightness, making it easily viewable even in direct sunlight. The Phantom V Fold's 492 nits is noticeably dimmer. While the Phantom V Fold advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, this is a nominal value and doesn't necessarily translate to a superior viewing experience compared to the X Fold2's calibrated display. Both offer vibrant colors and sharp resolution, but the X Fold2's brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Initial impressions suggest the X Fold2 may offer slightly better image processing and dynamic range. Both likely offer versatile shooting modes and good video recording capabilities, but the X Fold2's chipset may allow for more advanced video features.
Performance
The vivo X Fold2's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance edge over the Phantom V Fold's Dimensity 9000+. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the X Fold2. Both phones have ample RAM, but the Snapdragon's efficiency and raw power are undeniable.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings around 92-96 hours. However, the vivo X Fold2's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 26 minutes, significantly faster than the Phantom V Fold's 55 minutes.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Fold2 is ideal for power users, photography enthusiasts, and those who prioritize a premium experience and top-tier performance. The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who want to experience the foldable form factor without breaking the bank, but are willing to compromise on some features.