vivo X Fold2 vs Oppo Find N2: The Ultimate Folding Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold2 takes the crown with its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset. While the Oppo Find N2 boasts a refined design and excellent software, the X Fold2's performance and charging speed give it a clear edge for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold2 | Oppo Find N2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 28 | Available. Released 2022, December 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 161.3 x 143.4 x 6 mmFolded: 161.3 x 73.4 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 132.2 x 140.5 x 7.4 mmFolded: 132.2 x 72.6 x 14.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 279 g (9.84 oz) | 233 g or 237 g (8.22 oz) |
| - | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO4 AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1800 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (peak) 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.54 inches, 1080 x 2120 pixels, 18:9 ratio 1000 nits (HBM), 1350 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 108˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby support) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Dual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless | 67W wired, 37% in 10 min, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black, Green, White |
| Models | V2266A | PGU110 |
| Price | About 1330 EUR | About 1100 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 962082 (v9) GeekBench: 3670 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Fold2
- Significantly faster charging (120W)
- Brighter display (1308 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Longer battery life (96h endurance rating)
- Reverse wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
- Design might be slightly less refined than Find N2
Oppo Find N2
- Refined design and build quality
- Excellent software optimization
- Good camera performance
- Competitive display quality
- Slower charging (67W)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Shorter battery life (83h endurance rating)
Display Comparison
The vivo X Fold2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1308 nits, significantly exceeding the Oppo Find N2's 1216 nits. Both offer excellent contrast, with the Find N2 claiming an 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term). The X Fold2's higher brightness provides better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays are vibrant and sharp, making media consumption a pleasure.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Initial impressions suggest both offer excellent image quality in various lighting conditions. The X Fold2's newer chipset may offer slightly better image processing capabilities. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
The vivo X Fold2's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Oppo Find N2's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Gen 2 offers improved efficiency and raw power, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. Gaming performance is also superior on the X Fold2.
Battery Life
The vivo X Fold2 holds a clear advantage in battery life, with an endurance rating of 96 hours compared to the Oppo Find N2's 83 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges. The X Fold2's 120W wired charging is also a game-changer, fully charging the phone in just 26 minutes, while the Find N2 takes 42 minutes with its 67W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Fold2 is ideal for power users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a vibrant display. The Oppo Find N2 is a great choice for those seeking a more polished and refined foldable experience with a focus on design and software optimization, and who don't need the absolute fastest charging.