vivo X Fold2 vs Honor Magic Vs Ultimate: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold2 takes the crown with its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset. While the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate boasts a refined hinge and potentially better software optimization, the X Fold2's raw performance and charging speed give it a clear edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold2 | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2022, November 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 28 | Available. Released 2022, December 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 161.3 x 143.4 x 6 mmFolded: 161.3 x 73.4 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 279 g (9.84 oz) | 265 g (9.35 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO4 AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1800 nits (peak) | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (peak) 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 108˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Dual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless | 66W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Gold, Black |
| Models | V2266A | FRI-AN10 |
| Price | About 1330 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
vivo X Fold2
- Significantly faster charging (120W)
- Brighter display (1308 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Excellent camera system (expected)
- Potentially higher price
- Software optimization may not be as refined as Honor
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Potentially more compact and durable design
- Refined hinge mechanism
- Potentially more polished software experience
- Good camera system (expected)
- Slower charging (66W)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Lower peak brightness
Display Comparison
The vivo X Fold2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1308 nits, significantly outshining the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate. Both devices feature excellent foldable displays, but the X Fold2's superior brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight. Color accuracy and refresh rates are likely comparable, offering a smooth and vibrant viewing experience on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to have excellent camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The vivo X Fold2 is likely to offer slightly better image processing and video recording capabilities due to its newer chipset and potentially more advanced camera hardware. Both should deliver impressive results in various lighting conditions.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the vivo X Fold2 is a clear winner here. It offers a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate, resulting in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. While the Magic Vs Ultimate is still capable, the X Fold2 provides a more premium experience.
Battery Life
The vivo X Fold2's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 26 minutes. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate's 66W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. Both phones likely have similar battery capacities, but the X Fold2's charging speed provides a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Fold2 is ideal for power users and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance and lightning-fast charging. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is a great choice for those prioritizing a more compact and durable design, and a potentially more polished software experience, even if it means sacrificing some performance.