vivo X Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships

The foldable phone market is maturing, and the vivo X Fold enters the arena as a direct competitor to Samsung’s established Galaxy Z Fold5. While Samsung refines its formula with iterative improvements, vivo aims to disrupt with a focus on charging speed and potentially a more aggressive price point. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, helping you determine which foldable best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing longevity and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is the safer bet. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and measured 12:01h active use battery life provide a smoother, more efficient experience. However, the vivo X Fold’s 66W charging offers a significant convenience advantage.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X Fold Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, April 112023, July 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, April 22Available. Released 2023, August 11
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mmUnfolded: 154.9 x 129.9 x 6.1 mmFolded: 154.9 x 67.1 x 13.4 mm
SIMNano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Weight311 g (10.97 oz)253 g (8.92 oz)
Display
Resolution1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density)1812 x 2176 pixels (~373 ppi density)
Size8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio)7.6 inches, 183.2 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 740
OSAndroid 12, OriginOS OceanAndroid 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide)-
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 66mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)4 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 2.0µm, under display Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack No-
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavICGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging66W wired, 100% in 37 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless25W wired, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless
Type4600 mAhLi-Po 4400 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, BlueIcy Blue, Phantom Black, Cream, Gray, Blue
ModelsV2178ASM-F946B, SM-F946B/DS, SM-F946U, SM-F946U1, SM-F946N, SM-F946W, SM-F9460
PriceAbout 1300 EUR€ 660.00 / $ 607.00 / £ 520.69 / ₹ 86,000
SAR-1.16 W/kg (head)
SAR EU-1.24 W/kg (head)     1.19 W/kg (body)

vivo X Fold

  • Significantly faster 66W wired charging
  • Potentially more aggressive pricing
  • 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging

  • Older Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
  • Limited camera information available
  • Software support may be less consistent than Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

  • More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
  • Brighter and more color-accurate display
  • Proven software experience and long-term support

  • Slower 25W wired charging
  • Higher price point
  • Less impressive wireless charging speeds

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1257 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the vivo X Fold (brightness data unavailable). Both utilize foldable LTPO displays, crucial for adaptive refresh rates and power efficiency. However, Samsung’s display technology is more mature, likely resulting in better color accuracy and reduced crease visibility. The Z Fold5’s cover display also benefits from a more conventional aspect ratio, enhancing usability as a standard smartphone.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specs for the vivo X Fold are unavailable, making a direct comparison challenging. However, Samsung typically excels in image processing and offers a more versatile camera system. The Z Fold5’s camera benefits from Samsung’s computational photography expertise, delivering consistent results across various lighting conditions. While the X Fold may offer competitive hardware, Samsung’s software optimization is a key differentiator. We can assume the Z Fold5 will have better video stabilization and more refined portrait modes.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X Fold utilizes the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Z Fold5 features the newer SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. This generational leap translates to a significant performance advantage for the Z Fold5. The Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 core, clocked at 3.36 GHz, outperforms the Gen 1’s X2 core (3.00 GHz). Furthermore, the Gen 2’s improved 4nm process offers better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. The Z Fold5’s LPDDR5x RAM also contributes to faster data transfer speeds.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 demonstrates superior battery endurance with a measured active use score of 12:01h and an endurance rating of 95h. While the vivo X Fold’s battery capacity is unknown, its 66W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a 100% charge in just 37 minutes. The Z Fold5’s 25W charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%, feels comparatively slow. The X Fold also offers 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, exceeding the Z Fold5’s 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless capabilities.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X Fold if you prioritize incredibly fast charging – 66W is a game-changer for foldable convenience – and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 if you value a proven track record of software updates, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s established foldable technology.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How much does the charging speed of the vivo X Fold actually impact daily use?
The 66W charging on the vivo X Fold is a significant advantage. It allows you to top up the battery from 0-100% in approximately 37 minutes, minimizing downtime and making it much more convenient to quickly recharge throughout the day, especially compared to the Z Fold5's 25W charging.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the vivo X Fold sufficient for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a capable chipset, it's a generation behind the Z Fold5's Gen 2. You'll likely experience slightly lower frame rates in graphically intensive games and longer rendering times for video editing. However, for everyday tasks and moderate use, the Gen 1 remains a solid performer.
❓ What are the potential downsides of choosing the vivo X Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 in terms of software updates?
Samsung has a strong track record of providing timely software updates and security patches for its flagship devices. vivo's update schedule is less predictable. Choosing the X Fold means potentially receiving updates later or for a shorter duration compared to the Z Fold5, which could impact long-term security and feature availability.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5's cover screen offer a better experience for quick tasks compared to the vivo X Fold?
The Z Fold5's cover screen has a more traditional smartphone aspect ratio, making it easier to use for typing, browsing, and quick interactions without unfolding the device. The X Fold's cover screen dimensions are unknown, but a less conventional aspect ratio could make it less comfortable for these tasks.