vivo X Fold vs. Oppo Find N3 Flip: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Battery Life

The foldable phone market is heating up, with the vivo X Fold and Oppo Find N3 Flip representing distinct approaches. The X Fold, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, aims for all-around flagship performance. Meanwhile, the Find N3 Flip, with its Dimensity 9200, prioritizes battery life and a refined flip-phone experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery and a more compact form factor, the Oppo Find N3 Flip emerges as the winner. Its impressive 12:58h active use score and 92h endurance rating significantly outperform the vivo X Fold, despite the latter's faster wired charging. However, power users demanding raw processing power may lean towards the X Fold.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X Fold Oppo Find N3 Flip
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, April 112023, August 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, April 22Available. Released 2023, September 08
Body
Build-Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mmUnfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm
SIMNano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight311 g (10.97 oz)198 g (6.98 oz)
Display
Resolution1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density)1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 730Immortalis-G715 MC11
OSAndroid 12, OriginOS OceanAndroid 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide)-
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack No-
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired, 100% in 37 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired
Type4600 mAhLi-Po 4300 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, BlueCream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black
ModelsV2178APHT110, CPH2519
PriceAbout 1300 EURAbout 1200 EUR

vivo X Fold

  • Faster 66W wired charging for quicker top-ups.
  • Potentially higher sustained performance for demanding tasks.
  • Larger foldable display (assumed, based on typical X Fold design).

  • Likely shorter battery life compared to the N3 Flip.
  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 may throttle under prolonged heavy load.
  • Less compact form factor.

Oppo Find N3 Flip

  • Exceptional battery life with 12:58h active use and 92h endurance.
  • More compact and pocketable flip-phone design.
  • Dimensity 9200 offers a modern CPU architecture.

  • Slower 44W wired charging.
  • Potentially less raw processing power for intensive tasks.
  • Smaller cover display compared to unfolded X Fold.

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a measured peak brightness of 939 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display in outdoor conditions. While the X Fold’s display specs are not provided, vivo typically employs high-quality panels. The N3 Flip’s smaller, flip-phone form factor inherently offers a more compact viewing experience. The absence of LTPO information for either device makes it difficult to assess power efficiency gains from variable refresh rates, but the N3 Flip’s focus on battery life suggests optimization in this area.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specs are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s camera is described as 'Photo / Video', indicating a versatile setup. Without specific sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The X Fold’s camera system is not detailed, but vivo often prioritizes image processing and computational photography. The absence of information regarding OIS on either device makes it impossible to assess low-light performance advantages. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro cameras on both devices, the main sensor capabilities will dictate image quality.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (4nm) features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz, offering a slight architectural advantage over the vivo X Fold’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) and its Cortex-X2 core at 3.00 GHz. The Dimensity 9200’s Cortex-A715 cores, clocked at 2.85 GHz, also represent an improvement over the Snapdragon’s A710 cores at 2.50 GHz. Both utilize the same Cortex-A510 efficiency cores at 1.80 GHz. This translates to potentially faster application loading and smoother multitasking on the N3 Flip, though real-world differences may be subtle. Thermal management will be crucial for sustained performance on both devices.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find N3 Flip shines in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 12:58h and an endurance rating of 92h. This is a significant advantage over the vivo X Fold, which lacks comparable battery life data. The N3 Flip’s 44W wired charging reaches 50% in 23 minutes, while the X Fold’s 66W charging achieves 100% in 37 minutes. While the X Fold charges faster overall, the N3 Flip’s superior battery life minimizes the need for frequent charging. The N3 Flip also offers reverse wired charging, a feature the X Fold matches with reverse wireless charging.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X Fold if you need a larger, more traditional foldable experience with a focus on sustained performance for demanding tasks like video editing or extended gaming sessions. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prefer a more pocketable, stylish foldable with exceptional battery life for everyday use, social media, and casual gaming. The Flip’s focus is on convenience and longevity between charges.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 in the Oppo Find N3 Flip experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9200 is a powerful chipset, thermal throttling is always a possibility during prolonged, graphically intensive gaming. However, the N3 Flip’s flip-phone design may offer better thermal dissipation compared to larger devices. Real-world testing is needed to determine the extent of any throttling.
❓ How does the hinge durability compare between the vivo X Fold and the Oppo Find N3 Flip?
Both vivo and Oppo have invested heavily in hinge technology for their foldable phones. Oppo’s Find N series is known for its robust hinge design, minimizing the visible crease. While the X Fold’s hinge durability is also good, the N3 Flip’s hinge is generally considered to be more refined and reliable based on early reviews.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the Oppo Find N3 Flip significantly slower than the 66W charging on the vivo X Fold in real-world usage?
While 66W is faster on paper, the N3 Flip’s superior battery life means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently. The difference in charging time for a typical top-up (e.g., 0-50%) may not be substantial enough to be a major inconvenience, especially considering the longer time between charges.