vivo X Fold vs Google Pixel Fold: Which Foldable Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and faster charging, the vivo X Fold is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 delivers more consistent power, and 66W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel Fold’s implementation. However, the Pixel Fold’s software experience and potential for unique Google features are compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold | Google Pixel Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 11 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 22 | Available. Released 2023, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm | Unfolded: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mmFolded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 283 g (9.98 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 1840 x 2208 pixels (~378 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 183.3 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| - | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.8 inches, 1080 x 2092 pixels, 17.4:9 ratio, 408 ppi 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 9.5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 100% in 37 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | Wired, PD3.0 Wireless |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4821 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Porcelain, Obsidian |
| Models | V2178A | G9FPL |
| Price | About 1300 EUR | € 670.87 / $ 389.26 / £ 899.99 |
vivo X Fold
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially superior CPU/GPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel Fold
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Google Pixel Fold
- Seamless Google software experience
- AI-powered features (Magic Eraser, etc.)
- Strong computational photography capabilities
- Slower charging speeds
- Tensor G2 may lag behind Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in raw performance
Display Comparison
While both devices feature foldable displays, specifics are missing. However, the X Fold’s likely higher refresh rate (typical of vivo flagships) could offer smoother scrolling. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s ISP will likely drive a brighter, more color-accurate external display. The Pixel Fold’s display benefits from Google’s color science, but the X Fold’s panel may offer superior peak brightness for outdoor visibility. The hinge mechanism is a critical, unaddressed factor; durability and crease visibility will be key differentiators.
Camera Comparison
Details on camera sensors are absent, but the X Fold’s Snapdragon ISP is known for its robust image processing capabilities. The Pixel Fold leverages Google’s computational photography expertise, which excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Tensor G2’s dedicated image processing unit will likely deliver superior HDR processing and portrait mode effects. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X Fold’s ISP offers greater flexibility for manual controls and potentially higher resolution video recording.
Performance
The vivo X Fold’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, offering a theoretical performance edge over the Google Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2 utilizes a Cortex-X1 core at 2.85 GHz, the Snapdragon’s architecture is generally more focused on sustained CPU and GPU performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks, but the X Fold will likely outperform in raw processing power.
Battery Life
Battery capacities are unspecified. However, the vivo X Fold’s 66W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 37 minutes. The Pixel Fold offers wired charging (PD3.0) and wireless charging, but lacks the X Fold’s speed. The X Fold also includes 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, adding versatility. Even with a potentially larger battery in the Pixel Fold, the X Fold’s faster charging mitigates range anxiety and allows for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X Fold if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value rapid charging speeds. It’s ideal for power users who want a foldable that can keep up with their workflow. Buy the Google Pixel Fold if you prioritize a seamless software experience, AI-powered features like Magic Eraser, and a camera tuned for Google’s computational photography style. It’s best for users deeply embedded in the Google ecosystem.