vivo X Fold+ vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 2: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold+ edges out the Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 thanks to its faster charging, slightly more powerful CPU, and generally more refined software experience. However, the Mix Fold 2 boasts a brighter display and a more premium design, making it a close contest.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold+ | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 29 | Available. Released 2022, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm | Unfolded: 161.1 x 144.7 x 5.4 mm Folded: 161.1 x 73.9 x 11.2 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 262 g (9.24 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott UTG glass |
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 1914 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.02 inches, 206.0 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO2 OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) 6.56 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MIUI Fold 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.6, 45mm (telephoto), dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 35 min (advertised) 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 40 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4730 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black, Gold |
| Models | V2229A | 22061218C |
| Price | About 1450 EUR | About 1300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1050139 (v9) GeekBench: 4368 (v5.1) GFXBench: 52fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Fold+
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Slightly faster CPU
- Generally refined software experience
- Good camera performance
- Battery life slightly less than Mix Fold 2
- Design less premium than Mix Fold 2
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
- Brighter display (1054 nits)
- Excellent battery life (82h endurance)
- Premium design and build quality
- More compact form factor
- Slower 67W wired charging
- Slightly slower CPU
- Software experience can be less polished
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1054 nits, significantly brighter than the X Fold+. Both offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors, but the Mix Fold 2's brightness advantage is noticeable, especially outdoors. The infinite contrast ratio claim for the Mix Fold 2 is nominal and difficult to quantify, but suggests excellent black levels.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. Both phones feature high-resolution sensors and advanced image processing. While specific camera specs are not detailed, reviews generally suggest the X Fold+ has a slight edge in overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Mix Fold 2's camera is still excellent, offering vibrant colors and detailed images.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, ensuring flagship-level performance. However, the X Fold+ has a slightly faster CPU clock speed on its Cortex-A710 cores (2.75 GHz vs 2.75 GHz on the Mix Fold 2), potentially offering a marginal performance boost in demanding tasks. Real-world performance will likely feel very similar.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 82 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The vivo X Fold+ has a slightly smaller battery and, while still offering good battery life, doesn't quite match the Mix Fold 2's longevity. The X Fold+'s 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the Mix Fold 2's 67W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Fold+ is ideal for power users who prioritize fast charging and a smooth, responsive experience. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 is a better choice for those who value a stunning display, a more luxurious feel, and a slightly more compact form factor.