vivo X Fold+ vs Huawei Mate X3: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold+ takes the crown with its faster charging, potentially better software experience (depending on region), and slightly more refined design. However, the Mate X3 boasts exceptional battery life and a stunning display, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing endurance and visual fidelity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold+ | Huawei Mate X3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm | Unfolded: 156.9 x 141.5 x 5.3 mmFolded: 156.9 x 72.4 x 11.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 239 g or 241 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | IPX8 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Kunlun Glass (cover display only) |
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 2224 x 2496 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 197.5 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2504 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | HarmonyOS 3.1 (China), EMUI 13.1 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (B1I+B1c+B2a), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter |
| - | BDS Satellite Message | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 35 min (advertised) 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 66W wired 50W wireless 7.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4730 mAh, non-removable | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 4800 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5060 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black, White, Violet, Dark Green, Gold |
| Models | V2229A | ALT-AL00, ALT-L29 |
| Price | About 1450 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 993592 (v9) GeekBench: 4283 (v5.5), 4512 (v6) GFXBench: 41fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Fold+
- Faster Charging (80W wired)
- Potentially better camera versatility
- Slightly more refined design (subjective)
- Likely better software support (region dependent)
- Battery life not as impressive as Mate X3
- Price may be higher
Huawei Mate X3
- Exceptional Battery Life (81h endurance)
- Bright and vibrant display (926 nits)
- Premium build quality
- Durable hinge design
- Slower charging speeds
- Potential software limitations (Huawei ecosystem)
- Camera may lack advanced features
Display Comparison
Both devices feature stunning foldable displays. The Mate X3 measures a peak brightness of 926 nits, offering excellent outdoor visibility. The X Fold+ likely has comparable brightness, but lacks a measured value. The Mate X3's 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a nominal value. The X Fold+ may offer slightly better color accuracy and calibration.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X Fold+ is expected to have a more versatile camera system, potentially including a periscope telephoto lens for superior zoom capabilities. While both offer Photo/Video capabilities, the X Fold+ likely has an edge in overall image quality and features. The Mate X3's camera performance is solid, but may lack the advanced features of the X Fold+.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and CPU configuration, guaranteeing flagship-level performance. Expect seamless multitasking, smooth gaming, and effortless handling of demanding applications on both devices. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal and depend more on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate X3 shines in this category, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 81 hours. The vivo X Fold+ offers 80W wired charging (0-100% in ~35 minutes) and 50W wireless charging, which is significantly faster than the Mate X3's 66W wired and 50W wireless charging. However, the Mate X3's sheer battery capacity provides longer overall usage.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Fold+ is ideal for power users who demand fast charging, a smooth performance, and appreciate a more versatile camera system. The Huawei Mate X3 is perfect for those prioritizing all-day battery life, a vibrant display, and a premium, durable build, especially if software limitations are not a concern.