vivo X Fold+ vs Honor Magic Vs Ultimate: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold+ edges out the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate thanks to its significantly faster wireless charging, slightly better camera capabilities, and potentially more refined software experience. However, the Magic Vs Ultimate boasts a more compact design and potentially a more durable hinge, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing portability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Fold+ | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2022, November 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 29 | Available. Released 2022, December 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 265 g (9.35 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 35 min (advertised) 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 66W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4730 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Gold, Black |
| Models | V2229A | FRI-AN10 |
| Price | About 1450 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
vivo X Fold+
- Faster Charging (Wired & Wireless)
- Potentially Better Camera
- Premium Build Quality
- Refined Software (potentially)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Larger and Heavier than Magic Vs Ultimate
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- More Compact Design
- Potentially More Durable Hinge
- Competitive Performance
- Good Value
- Slower Charging
- Potentially Less Refined Camera
- Limited Wireless Charging
Display Comparison
Both devices feature stunning AMOLED displays with high refresh rates. The vivo X Fold+ likely has slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to vivo's reputation for display quality. The Magic Vs Ultimate's display is known for its thin bezels and vibrant colors. The internal display sizes are similar, but the external cover displays differ slightly in size and aspect ratio, impacting usability.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X Fold+ is expected to have a slight edge in camera performance, potentially offering better image processing and low-light capabilities. Both phones feature versatile camera setups with multiple lenses, including ultrawide and telephoto options. Detailed camera comparisons will require extensive testing.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, ensuring flagship-level performance. Real-world performance will likely be very similar for most tasks, including gaming and multitasking. Software optimization could be a differentiating factor, with vivo potentially offering a more polished experience.
Battery Life
The vivo X Fold+ has a clear advantage with its 80W wired charging and 50W wireless charging, significantly faster than the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate's 66W wired and 5W wireless charging. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the faster charging speeds on the vivo X Fold+ will result in quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Fold+ is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, a versatile camera system, and a premium feel. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is a better choice for those seeking a more compact and potentially more durable foldable, especially if wireless charging isn't a top priority.