vivo X Flip vs vivo X Fold2: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold2 is the clear winner for power users needing a large display and blazing-fast charging. However, the X Flip’s smaller form factor and unique design make it a compelling choice for those prioritizing portability and a more pocketable foldable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Flip | vivo X Fold2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2023, April 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 28 | Available. Released 2023, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.3 x 7.8 mmFolded: 86.4 x 75.3 x 16.6 mm | Unfolded: 161.3 x 143.4 x 6 mmFolded: 161.3 x 73.4 x 12.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 279 g (9.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO4 AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 3 inches, 422 x 682 pixels, 14.5:9 ratio | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (peak) 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 106˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 108˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Dual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 120W wired, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4400 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | V2256A | V2266A |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 1330 EUR |
vivo X Flip
- Compact and pocketable design
- Unique clamshell folding mechanism
- Decent performance
- Bright external display
- Less powerful chipset than X Fold2
- Smaller internal display
- Slower charging speeds
vivo X Fold2
- Larger, more immersive display
- Significantly faster charging (wired & wireless)
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Reverse wireless charging
- Larger and less pocketable than X Flip
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The vivo X Fold2 takes a commanding lead in the display department. Its 1308 nits peak brightness significantly surpasses the X Flip's 1027 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Fold2's larger internal display also provides a more immersive experience for media and productivity. While the X Flip's external display is convenient, it's smaller and less bright.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. However, based on available information, both offer excellent photo and video capabilities. The Fold2's larger sensor sizes and potentially improved image processing algorithms could give it a slight advantage in low-light conditions and overall image quality. Further testing is needed to confirm.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the X Fold2 delivers a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the X Flip. While both phones are capable of handling demanding tasks, the Fold2's newer chipset ensures smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The CPU architecture differences also contribute to the Fold2's edge.
Battery Life
The X Flip initially boasts a slightly higher endurance rating (110h vs 96h), but the X Fold2's significantly faster charging capabilities (120W wired, 50W wireless) make it the more practical choice. The ability to charge to 100% in just 26 minutes is a game-changer, mitigating the slightly lower endurance rating.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Flip is ideal for users who want a stylish, compact foldable for everyday use, social media, and quick tasks. The vivo X Fold2 is best suited for those who need a large screen for multitasking, media consumption, and gaming, and appreciate significantly faster charging speeds.