vivo X Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Flip boasts a brighter display, a slightly more powerful chipset, and significantly faster charging. However, the Z Flip4 offers a more refined software experience, better battery life, and the convenience of wireless charging. Ultimately, the X Flip provides better raw performance, while the Z Flip4 excels in usability and ecosystem integration.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Flip | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (6CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2022, August 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 28 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame, glass back | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.3 x 7.8 mmFolded: 86.4 x 75.3 x 16.6 mm | Unfolded: 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm Folded: 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9-17.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.5 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 3 inches, 422 x 682 pixels, 14.5:9 ratio | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.9 inches, 260 x 512 pixels (Gorilla Glass Victus+) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 106˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | 12 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 3700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black | Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold, Blue, Yellow, White, Navy, Khaki, Red |
| Models | V2256A | SM-F721B, SM-F721B/DS, SM-F721N, SM-F721U, SM-F721U1, SM-F721W, SM-F7210 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | $ 214.99 / C$ 334.00 / £ 219.00 / € 284.00 / ₹ 40,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.02 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 685754 (v8) | 800001 (v9) GeekBench: 3913 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Flip
- Brighter Display
- Faster Charging (44W)
- Slightly More Powerful Chipset
- Unique Design
- Potentially Less Refined Software
- Battery Life Not as Good as Z Flip4
- Wireless Charging Missing
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
- Longer Battery Life
- Refined Software Experience
- Wireless Charging (15W)
- Reverse Wireless Charging (4.5W)
- Samsung Ecosystem Integration
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Lower Display Brightness
- Marginally Less Powerful Chipset
Display Comparison
The vivo X Flip takes a clear lead in display brightness, measuring 1027 nits compared to the Z Flip4's 919 nits. While both offer excellent color accuracy and sharpness, the X Flip's higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight. The Z Flip4's 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal value and doesn't translate to a significantly better viewing experience in practice.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more in-depth testing. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Z Flip4 benefits from Samsung's established image processing algorithms. The X Flip's camera hardware is likely comparable, but software optimization plays a crucial role. We'll need more extensive testing to determine a clear winner.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, but the vivo X Flip's CPU has slightly higher clock speeds (1x3.0 GHz vs 1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz vs 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710). This translates to a marginal performance advantage for the X Flip in demanding tasks, though real-world differences are likely to be minimal. Both phones handle everyday tasks and gaming with ease.
Battery Life
The Z Flip4 holds a significant advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 92h compared to the X Flip's 110h (which is likely a more optimistic estimate). While the X Flip charges much faster with 44W wired charging, the Z Flip4's longer battery life provides more peace of mind.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Flip is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance, a vibrant display, and fast charging, especially those comfortable with a potentially less polished software experience. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is a better choice for those seeking a more mature foldable experience, reliable battery life, and seamless integration with the Samsung ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some performance.