vivo X Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Flip boasts a significantly faster chipset, brighter display, and vastly superior battery life. While the Z Flip3 offers a more established ecosystem and wireless charging, the X Flip's performance and endurance make it the clear winner for users prioritizing power and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Flip | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 78, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2021, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 28 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame, glass back | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.3 x 7.8 mmFolded: 86.4 x 75.3 x 16.6 mm | Unfolded: 166 x 72.2 x 6.9 mm Folded: 86.4 x 72.2 x 15.9-17.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.5 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 3 inches, 422 x 682 pixels, 14.5:9 ratio | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.9 inches, 260 x 512 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 106˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 15W wired 10W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 3300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black | Phantom Black, Green, Lavender, Cream, White, Pink, Gray, Thom Browne Edition, Bespoke Edition, Wooyoungmi Edition, Dream White |
| Models | V2256A | SM-F711B, SM-F711N, SM-F711U, SM-F711U1, SM-F711W, SM-F7110 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | € 279.00 / $ 208.04 / £ 215.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 69h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 596866 (v8) | 682223 (v9) GeekBench: 3441 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Flip
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Brighter display (1027 nits)
- Exceptional battery life (110h endurance)
- Potentially improved camera processing
- Less established ecosystem compared to Samsung
- No wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
- Established Samsung ecosystem
- Wireless charging (10W)
- Reverse wireless charging (4.5W)
- More compact and familiar design
- Slower Snapdragon 888 5G chipset
- Lower peak brightness (935 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (69h endurance)
Display Comparison
The vivo X Flip takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1027 nits, significantly outshining the Z Flip3's 935 nits. Both phones feature excellent contrast, but the X Flip's higher brightness provides better visibility in direct sunlight. The Z Flip3's contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' which is a nominal value and doesn't provide a concrete comparison.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems for their form factor. While detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, initial impressions suggest the X Flip may offer slightly improved image processing and low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
Here, the vivo X Flip leaves no doubt. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Z Flip3's Snapdragon 888 5G. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games on the X Flip.
Battery Life
The vivo X Flip absolutely dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 110 hours is a massive leap over the Z Flip3's 69 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges, a crucial factor for foldable phone users.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Flip is ideal for power users and those who demand long battery life and a smooth, responsive experience. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is a great choice for those already invested in the Samsung ecosystem, prioritizing wireless charging, and seeking a more compact and familiar design.