vivo X Flip vs Oppo Find N2: The Ultimate Foldable Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find N2 edges out the vivo X Flip thanks to its faster charging, slightly brighter display, and more refined hinge design. However, the X Flip offers a more compact form factor and a potentially more accessible price point, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing portability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X Flip | Oppo Find N2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 28 | Available. Released 2022, December 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.3 x 7.8 mmFolded: 86.4 x 75.3 x 16.6 mm | Unfolded: 132.2 x 140.5 x 7.4 mmFolded: 132.2 x 72.6 x 14.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 233 g or 237 g (8.22 oz) |
| - | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) | 1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 3 inches, 422 x 682 pixels, 14.5:9 ratio | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.54 inches, 1080 x 2120 pixels, 18:9 ratio 1000 nits (HBM), 1350 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 106˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby support) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 67W wired, 37% in 10 min, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black | Black, Green, White |
| Models | V2256A | PGU110 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 1100 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 962082 (v9) GeekBench: 3670 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X Flip
- More compact form factor
- Excellent battery life (110h)
- Stylish design
- Potentially more affordable
- Slower charging (44W)
- Slightly dimmer display (1027 nits)
- Camera details are limited
Oppo Find N2
- Brighter display (1216 nits)
- Faster charging (67W)
- Potentially better camera tuning
- More refined hinge design
- Larger form factor
- Shorter battery life (83h)
- Likely more expensive
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N2 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1216 nits compared to the vivo X Flip's 1027 nits. While both offer excellent contrast (the Find N2 boasts an 'infinite' nominal contrast ratio), the Find N2's extra brightness will be noticeable in outdoor conditions. Both utilize high-quality panels, but the Find N2's edge is clear.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area for both devices. While both are described as 'Photo / Video' capable, detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general expectations for these brands and chipsets, both should deliver excellent image quality, but the Find N2 might have a slight edge due to Oppo's typically strong camera tuning. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, ensuring flagship-level performance. However, subtle CPU clock speed differences exist. The Find N2's A710 cores are slightly faster (2.75 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), potentially leading to marginally better performance in demanding tasks. Real-world differences are likely to be minimal for most users.
Battery Life
The vivo X Flip holds a significant advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 110-hour rating compared to the Oppo Find N2's 83 hours. However, the Find N2 compensates with significantly faster charging – 67W wired charging with a 37% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes, plus 10W reverse wired charging. The X Flip's 44W charging is still respectable, but not as rapid.
Buying Guide
The vivo X Flip is ideal for users who want a compact, stylish foldable for everyday use and social media. The Oppo Find N2 is better suited for power users who demand faster charging, a brighter display, and a more premium feel, even if it comes at a higher price.