The smartwatch market is increasingly competitive, with both vivo and Huawei offering compelling options in the sub-$200 price bracket. Both the vivo Watch and the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE prioritize convenience with wireless charging, but diverge in their broader feature sets and target audiences. This comparison dissects their capabilities to determine which smartwatch delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing a straightforward, potentially more versatile smartwatch experience with a slightly faster charging rate, the vivo Watch emerges as the winner. However, the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE remains a strong contender, particularly for those deeply embedded within the Huawei ecosystem and valuing its established health tracking features.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Speed | No | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 23. Released 2020, September 28 | 2022, November 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, November 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, stainless steel frame 316L | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 46 x 46 x 10.6 mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.42 in) | 46.4 x 46.4 x 11 mm (1.83 x 1.83 x 0.43 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 46.8 g (1.66 oz) | 35.6 g (1.27 oz) |
| | 5ATM water resistant
50m water resistant
Compatible with standard 22mm straps | 50m water resistant
5 ATM
Compatible with standard 22mm straps (46mm model) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 454 x 454 pixels (~326 ppi density) | 466 x 466 pixels (~326 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.39 inches | 1.43 inches |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| OS | Proprietary OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 2GB | 4GB |
| | eMMC | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, altimeter, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2 |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wireless | Wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 478 mAh | 455 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Brown, Dark Brown, Orange | Graphite Black, Wilderness Green |
| Models | - | RUNE-B29 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 200 EUR |
vivo Watch
- Potentially faster 10W wireless charging.
- May offer broader smartphone compatibility.
- Likely a more standard smartwatch OS experience.
- Detailed specifications are limited.
- Battery life is unknown and could be shorter than the GT 3 SE.
Huawei Watch GT 3 SE
- Strong integration with the Huawei ecosystem.
- Potentially longer battery life (typical of Huawei GT series).
- Established health and fitness tracking features.
- Wireless charging speed is unspecified and potentially slower.
- May have limited compatibility with non-Huawei smartphones.
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications (resolution, panel type, brightness) is unavailable for both devices. However, given the price point, it's reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither watch will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, prioritizing function over minimizing size. Color accuracy will likely be adequate for at-a-glance information but not professional color work.
Camera Comparison
Neither the vivo Watch nor the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE feature a camera, a common omission in modern smartwatches to prioritize battery life and slim profiles. This is a non-factor in the comparison.
Performance
Detailed chipset information is absent for both devices. However, smartwatches in this price range typically employ low-power processors optimized for efficiency rather than raw performance. The focus is on smooth operation of basic functions like timekeeping, notifications, and fitness tracking. RAM capacity is also unknown, but likely sufficient for the intended tasks. Thermal management is unlikely to be a significant concern given the limited processing demands.
Battery Life
Both watches utilize wireless charging, but the vivo Watch boasts a 10W charging rate, while the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE’s wattage is unspecified. This suggests the vivo Watch may achieve a faster 0-100% charge time. Battery capacity is not provided for either device, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Huawei typically prioritizes long battery life in its GT series, potentially giving the GT 3 SE an edge in longevity despite the potentially slower charging speed. The convenience of wireless charging, however, is a key benefit for both, eliminating the need for fiddly cables.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Watch if you need a smartwatch that offers a more standard smartwatch experience, potentially integrating more seamlessly with a wider range of smartphone platforms. Buy the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE if you prefer a smartwatch heavily focused on fitness tracking, long battery life, and are already invested in the Huawei/Honor ecosystem, benefiting from its optimized compatibility and data synchronization.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How does the wireless charging of the vivo Watch compare to using a traditional charging cable?
The vivo Watch's 10W wireless charging offers the convenience of simply placing the watch on a compatible charging pad, eliminating the need to plug in a cable. While potentially slightly slower than a wired connection (speculation due to lack of data), the ease of use and reduced wear and tear on the charging port make it a compelling alternative.
❓ Is the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE compatible with iPhones, or is it primarily designed for Android users?
While the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE can technically connect to an iPhone via Bluetooth, the experience is significantly limited compared to pairing it with an Android device. Features like notification syncing and data synchronization are less reliable, and you'll miss out on the full suite of Huawei's health and fitness tracking capabilities. It's primarily designed for Android users, especially those within the Huawei ecosystem.
❓ What type of wireless charging standard does each watch support (Qi, etc.)?
The wireless charging standard supported by both the vivo Watch and the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE is not explicitly stated. However, given the widespread adoption of Qi wireless charging, it's highly probable that both devices are compatible with Qi-enabled charging pads. This ensures broad compatibility with a variety of wireless chargers.
