The smartwatch market is heating up, with both vivo and Google offering compelling Wear OS options. The Google Pixel Watch 2 builds upon its predecessor with a faster chipset and refined software, while the vivo Watch 3 aims to deliver a feature-rich experience. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which smartwatch best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing seamless integration with the Google ecosystem and a proven track record of software updates, the Google Pixel Watch 2 is the stronger choice. Its Qualcomm 5100 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost, and the 80% charge in 45 minutes is convenient. However, the vivo Watch 3 may appeal to those seeking a potentially more affordable option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 13 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 21 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 46.1 x 46.1 x 13.8 mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.54 in) | 41 x 41 x 12.3 mm (1.61 x 1.61 x 0.48 in) |
| SIM | eSIM | eSIM |
| Weight | 36 g (1.27 oz) | 31 g (1.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 466 x 466 pixels (~326 ppi density) | 450 x 450 pixels (~320 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.43 inches | 1.2 inches |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm 5100 |
| OS | Blue OS | Android Wear OS 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 4GB 64MB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, altimeter, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, altimeter, compass, SpO2, thermometer (skin temperature), skin conductance |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wired, 80% in 45 min |
| Type | 505 mAh | Li-Ion 306 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Polished Silver, Matte Black, Champagne Gold |
| Models | - | G4TSL, GC3G8, GD2WG |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 160 EUR |
vivo Watch 3
- Potentially more affordable price point
- May offer a longer battery life (speculation based on potential larger battery)
- Could feature unique vivo-specific health tracking features
- Unknown chipset performance
- Lack of detailed specifications hinders comparison
- Uncertainty regarding software update support
Google Pixel Watch 2
- Powerful Qualcomm 5100 chipset for smooth performance
- Fast charging (80% in 45 minutes)
- Tight integration with Google services and Wear OS ecosystem
- Higher price point
- Battery life may be shorter than some competitors
- Design may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, specific display details for the vivo Watch 3 are unavailable. The Google Pixel Watch 2 features a circular AMOLED display, a design choice prioritizing aesthetics. Without knowing the vivo Watch 3’s panel technology (LTPO is crucial for battery efficiency) or resolution, it’s difficult to compare directly. However, the Pixel Watch 2’s always-on display functionality, enabled by its efficient chipset, is a significant advantage for at-a-glance information. The Pixel Watch 2’s curved glass also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Neither watch is designed for serious photography. Smartwatches generally lack the optics and sensor size required for high-quality images. As such, a detailed camera comparison is not applicable. Both devices likely feature minimal camera capabilities, primarily for quick scans or video calls.
Performance
The Google Pixel Watch 2’s Qualcomm 5100 chipset is the clear performance leader here. While the exact clock speed isn’t specified, the 5100 represents a substantial upgrade over the original Pixel Watch’s Exynos 9110. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother animations, and a more responsive user interface. The vivo Watch 3’s processor remains unknown, but given its likely positioning as a more budget-friendly option, it’s reasonable to assume it will offer less raw processing power. The Pixel Watch 2’s chipset also benefits from optimized power efficiency, contributing to better battery life.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel Watch 2 offers a charging speed of 80% in 45 minutes, a practical feature for users who need a quick top-up. Without knowing the vivo Watch 3’s battery capacity or charging speed, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Pixel Watch 2’s Qualcomm 5100 chipset is designed for power efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity compared to the vivo Watch 3. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the Pixel Watch 2’s optimized power management is a key advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Watch 3 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a brand less established in the Wear OS space. You'll likely benefit from a focus on core smartwatch features. Buy the Google Pixel Watch 2 if you value a polished user experience, tight integration with Google services like Google Assistant and Maps, and a commitment to long-term software support, even if it comes at a premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Qualcomm 5100 chipset in the Google Pixel Watch 2 generate excessive heat during demanding tasks?
The Qualcomm 5100 is designed with power efficiency in mind. While it can handle demanding tasks, it's unlikely to generate significant heat. Google has also implemented thermal management solutions to prevent overheating, ensuring a comfortable user experience even during prolonged use.
❓ What level of software support can vivo Watch 3 users expect compared to the Google Pixel Watch 2?
Google typically provides several years of software updates for its Pixel devices, including the Pixel Watch 2. Vivo's track record with smartwatch software updates is less established. Pixel Watch 2 users can expect timely security patches and feature enhancements, while vivo Watch 3 users may receive fewer updates over the device's lifespan.
❓ Is the 80% charge in 45 minutes on the Pixel Watch 2 a significant advantage for daily use?
Yes, the fast charging capability is a practical benefit. It allows users to quickly top up their watch's battery during short breaks, minimizing downtime and ensuring they have sufficient power throughout the day. This is particularly useful for users who frequently use power-intensive features like GPS tracking or always-on display.
