The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro and vivo V60e represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F5 Pro, leveraging a previous-generation flagship chipset, aims for raw performance, while the vivo V60e focuses on delivering a fast-charging experience with a more recent, efficiency-focused processor. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. However, the vivo V60e’s 90W charging and efficient Dimensity 7360 Turbo make it a strong contender for those who value battery convenience and all-day usability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 07 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 10 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Diamond Shield Glass), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 77 x 7.5 mm (6.44 x 3.03 x 0.30 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 90W wired
Reverse wired
Bypass charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Elite Purple, Noble Gold | Black, White |
| Models | - | 23013PC75G |
| Price | ₹ 27,499 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.11 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V60e
- 90W SuperCharge for incredibly fast wired charging
- Dimensity 7360 Turbo offers excellent power efficiency
- Bypass charging for reduced battery degradation during use
- Performance lags behind the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Camera specifications are currently unknown, potentially limiting image quality
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers flagship-level performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Wireless charging support for added convenience
- Slower wired charging compared to the vivo V60e
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the vivo V60e (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Poco’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The Poco’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) is standard for AMOLED, ensuring deep blacks. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rate for optimal power saving, relying instead on fixed refresh rate settings.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the vivo V60e. The Poco F5 Pro’s camera system likely benefits from the Snapdragon’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor). Without specific details on the V60e’s sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests it may be absent or limited to one of the lenses. It's reasonable to assume the Poco F5 Pro will deliver more consistent and detailed images, particularly in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, designed for peak performance, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores. This configuration will demonstrably outperform the vivo V60e’s Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4nm) in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Dimensity 7360 Turbo utilizes a Cortex-A78 prime core at 2.5 GHz, which, while efficient, doesn’t match the Snapdragon’s raw processing power. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, suggesting comparable efficiency, but the Snapdragon’s architecture is geared towards higher sustained performance. The Poco’s likely LPDDR5X RAM further enhances its performance edge.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified for the V60e). However, the charging experience is drastically different. The vivo V60e’s 90W wired charging is significantly faster than the Poco F5 Pro’s 67W wired charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. The V60e also offers reverse wired charging and bypass charging, features absent on the Poco. The Poco F5 Pro compensates with 30W wireless charging, a feature the V60e lacks. While the Poco claims 50% charge in 15 minutes with 67W, the V60e’s 90W should be noticeably faster.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V60e if you need consistently fast charging, prioritize battery health with features like bypass charging, and prefer a more power-efficient processor for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming and resource-intensive applications, and are willing to trade some charging speed for that extra power. The Poco is also a better choice for users who frequently utilize demanding camera features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7360 Turbo in the vivo V60e struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 7360 Turbo is a capable processor, it won't deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro when running graphically intensive games. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve smooth frame rates in titles like Genshin Impact on the V60e.
❓ How does the 30W wireless charging on the Poco F5 Pro compare to the 67W wired charging on other devices?
30W wireless charging is convenient, but it's significantly slower than 67W or 90W wired charging. Expect a full wireless charge to take over an hour, whereas the Poco F5 Pro's wired charging can reach 50% in 15 minutes. The vivo V60e's 90W wired charging is even faster, making it the preferred option for quick top-ups.
❓ What is 'bypass charging' on the vivo V60e and why is it beneficial?
Bypass charging allows you to power the phone directly from the charger, bypassing the battery entirely. This reduces heat buildup and minimizes battery degradation during extended use, such as gaming or streaming, making it a valuable feature for preserving long-term battery health.
