vivo V60e vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the vivo V60e is the winner. Its Dimensity 7360 Turbo and 90W charging offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in battery endurance, making it ideal for users who need all-day power without frequent top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V60e | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 07 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 10 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Diamond Shield Glass), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 77 x 7.5 mm (6.44 x 3.03 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Elite Purple, Noble Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 27,499 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR EU | 1.11 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V60e
- Faster 90W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal performance with 4nm Dimensity 7360 Turbo
- More A78 cores for potentially better multi-tasking
- Battery life is unknown and potentially lower than the Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness not specified, potentially inferior to the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use, 80h endurance)
- Bright 1073 nit display for outdoor visibility
- 68W fast charging
- Older 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Fewer A78 cores compared to the V60e
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, where the V60e’s display brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness provides a superior viewing experience in challenging lighting conditions. The V60e’s display specs are currently unknown, making it difficult to assess color accuracy or refresh rate capabilities beyond what is typical for the price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but specifics are scarce. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera is listed as capable of both Photo and Video, suggesting a focus on versatility. Without sensor size or aperture details for either device, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or dynamic range. We can assume both will offer acceptable image quality for social media sharing, but neither is likely to challenge flagship-level camera performance.
Performance
The vivo V60e’s Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4nm) offers a potential edge over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The smaller 4nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The V60e’s CPU configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is identical in core count to the Edge 40 Neo (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), but the V60e has more of the higher performance A78 cores. This suggests a slight advantage in multi-threaded tasks and responsiveness. However, real-world performance will depend on software optimization and RAM management.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly wins in battery endurance, achieving 10:28h of active use and an impressive 80-hour endurance rating. While the vivo V60e’s battery capacity is unknown, its 90W wired charging is a significant advantage. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging reaches 50% in 15 minutes, but the V60e’s 90W promises even faster top-ups. This trade-off caters to different user needs: the Edge 40 Neo for long-lasting power, and the V60e for rapid replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V60e if you need the fastest possible charging and want a phone that feels responsive for demanding apps and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life and a brighter, more visible display, especially if you’re often outdoors or consume a lot of video content. It’s the better choice for users who value longevity over peak performance.