vivo V60 vs Oppo Reno6 Lite: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V60 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the Reno6 Lite’s Snapdragon 662. The 90W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing downtime. While the Reno6 Lite offers a lower entry price, the V60’s advancements justify the cost for those prioritizing speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V60 | Oppo Reno6 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 26, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 12 | 2022, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 19 | Available. Released 2022, January 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 77 x 7.5 mm or 7.8 mm | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g or 201 g (6.77 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Core | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 1500 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD Reverse wired Bypass charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mist Grey, Moonlit Blue, Ocean Blue, Auspicious Gold, Berry Purple | Black, Rainbow Silver |
| Models | V2511 | CPH2365 |
| Price | ₹ 36,999 | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V60
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 7 Gen 4)
- Ultra-fast 90W charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack expandable storage (spec not provided)
Oppo Reno6 Lite
- More affordable price
- Established brand reputation
- Lightweight and comfortable to hold (assumed based on Reno series)
- Outdated Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Less capable camera system
Display Comparison
The vivo V60 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1456 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight, a clear advantage over the Reno6 Lite (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this segment). While both likely utilize LCD panels, the V60’s higher brightness and potentially improved color calibration offer a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience. The Reno6 Lite’s display is adequate for everyday use, but lacks the punch of the V60.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 of the V60 suggests improved image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. While both phones likely feature a standard array of lenses, the V60’s chipset allows for more sophisticated computational photography techniques. The Reno6 Lite’s camera is likely sufficient for casual photography, but the V60 should deliver more detailed and dynamic images.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V60’s Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno6 Lite’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 4nm process node of the 7 Gen 4 provides superior power efficiency and thermal management, resulting in sustained performance during intensive tasks. The V60’s CPU configuration – a tri-cluster setup with Cortex-720 cores – offers a noticeable performance boost in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks. The Reno6 Lite’s Kryo 260 cores, while competent, are simply outmatched. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the V60.
Battery Life
The vivo V60’s 90W wired charging with PD and bypass charging is a standout feature. This allows for incredibly fast charging speeds – a full charge in under 40 minutes is highly probable. The Oppo Reno6 Lite’s 33W charging, while respectable, pales in comparison, taking significantly longer to reach 100% (advertised 54% in 30 minutes). The V60’s active use battery score of 15:52h indicates excellent battery life, likely benefiting from the efficiency of the 4nm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. While the Reno6 Lite’s battery life is not specified, it’s expected to be lower due to the less efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V60 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, enjoy extended gaming sessions, and value incredibly fast charging. It’s ideal for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Oppo Reno6 Lite if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. It’s a solid option for budget-conscious users who don’t require cutting-edge performance.