vivo V60 vs OnePlus Nord 2T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V60 emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly brighter display (1456 nits vs 636 nits) and more efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset, coupled with 90W charging, provide a superior overall experience, especially for outdoor visibility and sustained performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V60 | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 12 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 19 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 77 x 7.5 mm or 7.8 mm | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g or 201 g (6.77 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Core | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 1500 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD Reverse wired Bypass charging | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mist Grey, Moonlit Blue, Ocean Blue, Auspicious Gold, Berry Purple | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | V2511 | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | ₹ 36,999 | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V60
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor use
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset
- Faster 90W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- CPU clock speed slightly lower than Nord 2T's prime core
- Limited camera specification details
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Established brand reputation with OnePlus
- Potentially refined image processing
- Solid all-around performance
- Supports fast 80W charging
- Dimmer display, less usable in sunlight
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 1300 chipset
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The display is where the vivo V60 truly shines. Its measured peak brightness of 1456 nits dwarfs the OnePlus Nord 2T’s 636 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight. While the Nord 2T boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), this is less impactful than the sheer brightness advantage of the V60. The V60’s panel technology isn’t specified, but the brightness suggests a high-quality AMOLED. The Nord 2T’s display, while still good, will appear washed out in comparison under bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the absence of specific camera details suggests neither phone is a standout in this category. The Nord 2T’s brand reputation hints at potentially more refined image processing, but this is speculative. We can assume both phones will offer acceptable image quality for social media and casual use, but won’t compete with flagship camera systems.
Performance
Under the hood, the vivo V60’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) and the OnePlus Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300 (6nm) represent different approaches to mid-range performance. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4’s smaller 4nm process node offers superior power efficiency, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during prolonged use. The Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300 features a more powerful prime core (3.0 GHz Cortex-A78) compared to the V60’s (2.8 GHz Cortex-720), but the V60’s more modern architecture and efficiency gains likely offset this in real-world scenarios. The V60’s CPU configuration (1+4+3) also suggests a focus on balancing performance and efficiency.
Battery Life
The vivo V60 boasts an impressive active use battery score of 15:52h, while the OnePlus Nord 2T has an endurance rating of 100h. While these are different metrics, the V60’s real-world usage score is more informative. The Nord 2T’s 100h rating is likely based on a more conservative usage model. Both phones support fast charging – 90W for the V60 and 80W for the Nord 2T. The V60’s faster charging will result in quicker top-ups, a significant advantage for users who frequently need to recharge their devices. Both support PD, and the V60 adds reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V60 if you prioritize display quality, long-term performance efficiency, and faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who consume a lot of media outdoors or engage in extended gaming sessions. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you value a brand with a strong software track record and are less concerned with peak display brightness or the latest chipset architecture. It’s a solid all-rounder, but doesn’t excel in any single area as dramatically as the V60.