vivo V60 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the stronger choice. Its 13:27h active use score demonstrates superior stamina. However, users who frequently top up their phones and value the fastest possible charging speeds will find the vivo V60 Lite’s 90W charging a significant advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V60 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 24 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 24 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.3 x 7.6 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 100% in 52 min 6W reverse wired Bypass charging | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Vitality Pink, Titanium Mist Blue, Ocean Night Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | - | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
vivo V60 Lite
- 90W SuperCharge for incredibly fast charging.
- Newer Dimensity 7360 Turbo chipset potentially offers better efficiency.
- Bypass charging feature for optimized battery health.
- Battery life is currently unknown and may be lower than the A55.
- Limited camera details available for a thorough assessment.
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Exceptional 13:27h active use battery life.
- Bright 1010 nits display for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Samsung’s One UI software provides a polished and feature-rich experience.
- Significantly slower 25W charging.
- Exynos 1480 may be prone to thermal throttling under sustained load.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits peak brightness, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the V60 Lite (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the A55’s brighter panel demands more power. The A55’s panel technology is likely to be AMOLED, offering superior contrast and color accuracy, though this isn’t explicitly stated. The V60 Lite’s display specs are currently unknown, making a direct comparison of color gamut coverage and resolution impossible, but it’s likely to be a cost-optimized LCD panel.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the vivo V60 Lite are currently limited. The Samsung Galaxy A55’s camera system is expected to feature a primary sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), crucial for sharp photos and stable videos, though the sensor size is unknown. Without knowing the sensor sizes and apertures of both devices, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of detail. Image processing will likely differ significantly, with Samsung favoring vibrant, saturated colors and vivo potentially leaning towards a more natural look.
Performance
Both the vivo V60 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A55 employ 4nm chipsets, but the Exynos 1480 in the A55 (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) has a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed than the Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This suggests a marginal performance advantage for the A55 in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Dimensity 7360 Turbo is a newer architecture, potentially offering improved efficiency and GPU performance. Both devices share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, meaning multi-tasking performance will be comparable. RAM configurations are unknown for both devices, but LPDDR5x would be expected in this price range to maximize memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrably leads in battery endurance, achieving 13:27h of active use. The vivo V60 Lite’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 90W wired charging capability is a standout feature, promising a full charge in just 52 minutes. The A55’s 25W charging is considerably slower. While the V60 Lite’s faster charging is convenient, it doesn’t negate the A55’s superior battery life. The V60 Lite also offers 6W reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up accessories, a feature absent on the A55.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V60 Lite if you need blazing-fast 90W charging and a more recent chipset architecture, making it ideal for power users who don't mind more frequent, but quicker, charging cycles. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer exceptional battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the reliability of Samsung’s One UI software, even if it means slower charging.