vivo V60 Lite vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing blazing-fast charging and peak performance in short bursts, the vivo V60 Lite is the winner. Its 90W charging and newer Dimensity 7360 Turbo chipset offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in sustained battery life, making it ideal for all-day users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V60 Lite | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 24 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 24 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.3 x 7.6 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 100% in 52 min 6W reverse wired Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Vitality Pink, Titanium Mist Blue, Ocean Night Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo V60 Lite
- Blazing-fast 90W charging
- Potentially better CPU performance with Dimensity 7360 Turbo
- 4nm process for improved efficiency
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera details are unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use, 80h endurance)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- 68W fast charging
- Dimensity 7030 chipset is less powerful than the 7360 Turbo
- 6nm process is less efficient
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the V60 Lite’s display specs are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s panel offers a significant advantage in direct sunlight. The Edge 40 Neo’s display technology is likely OLED, offering excellent contrast, while the V60 Lite’s panel type is unknown. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified for either device, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera is described as offering both photo and video capabilities, but specific sensor sizes and apertures are missing. The V60 Lite’s camera specs are also unavailable. Without detailed information, it’s difficult to assess camera quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The vivo V60 Lite’s Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4nm) holds a theoretical advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) due to the smaller fabrication node. A 4nm process generally leads to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. The V60 Lite’s CPU configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) features a slightly higher clock speed on its prime cores compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), suggesting a potential edge in single-core tasks. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s six efficiency cores could offer better multi-core performance in sustained workloads. RAM specifications are not provided for either device, but LPDDR5x support would be a significant benefit.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery life, achieving an active use score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80h. This indicates excellent longevity for all-day use. The vivo V60 Lite’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 90W wired charging is a major draw, promising a full charge in just 52 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging, while still fast, takes longer to reach 50% (15 minutes). The V60 Lite also offers 6W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V60 Lite if you frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly and enjoy demanding apps or mobile games. Its 90W charging and more powerful CPU are geared towards power users. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value all-day battery life and a balanced experience. The Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating and measured battery performance make it the better choice for those who prioritize longevity over peak speed.