The vivo V60 Lite 4G and Realme 8i represent compelling options in the competitive budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The V60 Lite prioritizes rapid charging and a newer chipset, while the 8i focuses on established gaming capabilities and a measured battery endurance rating. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and efficient performance, the vivo V60 Lite 4G emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 685, built on a 6nm process, offers a more modern architecture and faster charging speeds than the Realme 8i's older Helio G96. However, gamers heavily invested in sustained performance may find the 8i's gaming-focused chipset appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 25 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 08 | Available. Released 2021, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.3 x 7.6 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 100% in 55 min
6W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 18W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Space Black, Space Purple |
| Models | V2530 | RMX3151 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.4 LUFS (Average)
|
vivo V60 Lite 4G
- Ultra-fast 90W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Modern 6nm process for better thermal management
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Realme 8i
- Gaming-focused Helio G96 chipset
- Measured display brightness and contrast ratio
- Proven battery endurance rating
- Slower 18W charging
- Less efficient 12nm process
Display Comparison
The Realme 8i boasts a measured peak brightness of 540 nits and a 1244:1 contrast ratio, providing a reasonably viewable experience. However, the V60 Lite’s display specifications are not provided, leaving its visual performance an unknown. Given the market segment, it’s likely to be a similar LCD panel, but without specific data, a direct comparison is impossible. The Realme 8i’s contrast ratio suggests decent black levels, but the V60 Lite’s potential color accuracy and viewing angles remain unassessed.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for both. Without sensor size, aperture information, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Realme 8i is a common inclusion in this price bracket, but its utility is often limited. The V60 Lite’s camera system remains largely a mystery without further details. We can assume both will offer adequate performance for social media sharing, but serious photography enthusiasts will likely need to look elsewhere.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V60 Lite 4G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This 6nm process offers improved power efficiency compared to the Realme 8i’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Helio G96 has an octa-core setup with 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the G96’s Cortex-A76 cores offer higher peak performance, the Snapdragon 685’s more efficient architecture and newer process node likely translate to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling during extended use. The Snapdragon 685’s architecture is also more modern, potentially offering better AI processing capabilities.
Battery Life
The Realme 8i has an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating respectable battery life. However, the V60 Lite’s battery capacity is unknown. The significant advantage of the V60 Lite is its 90W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% charge in just 55 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the Realme 8i’s 18W charging. The V60 Lite also offers 6W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the 8i, allowing it to top up other devices. While the 8i’s endurance rating suggests good longevity, the V60 Lite’s rapid charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V60 Lite 4G if you need blazing-fast 90W charging, a more power-efficient processor for all-day use, and appreciate a modern chipset architecture. Buy the Realme 8i if you prioritize a phone specifically tuned for gaming, are comfortable with slower 18W charging, and value a phone with a proven track record in mobile gaming communities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 685 in the vivo V60 Lite 4G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
While not a flagship chipset, the Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG and Genshin Impact at medium settings. The 6nm process helps maintain stable performance for longer periods compared to the Helio G96, reducing the likelihood of significant frame drops due to thermal throttling. However, users seeking the highest possible graphics settings should consider a more powerful device.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Realme 8i slow compared to the vivo V60 Lite 4G's 90W charging?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 18W charging will take significantly longer to fully charge the Realme 8i – likely over 2 hours. The vivo V60 Lite 4G can reach 100% in just 55 minutes, making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ How does the Helio G96's performance compare to the Snapdragon 685 in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For everyday tasks, both chipsets will provide a smooth and responsive experience. The Snapdragon 685’s efficiency will likely result in slightly better battery life during typical usage. The difference in performance will be negligible for most users.
