vivo V50e vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the vivo V50e emerges as the stronger contender. Its newer Dimensity 7300 chipset delivers superior CPU and GPU performance, coupled with significantly faster 90W charging. While the Oppo Reno 5G remains a viable option, the V50e’s advancements justify its position as the better overall choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V50e | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 17 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 mm or 7.6 mm | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5600 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sapphire Blue, Pearl White | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | V2428 | CPH1921 |
| Price | € 249.70 / ₹ 24,999 | About 880 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V50e
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Likely improved camera performance due to newer processing
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack some legacy features found on the Reno 5G
Oppo Reno 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Established brand reputation
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Slower 20W charging
- Older Snapdragon 855 chipset prone to throttling
- Less efficient power consumption
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Reno 5G's launch timeframe, it likely features an AMOLED panel, potentially with a 90Hz refresh rate. The V50e, being a more recent release, may also utilize AMOLED technology, and could potentially include features like LTPO for variable refresh rates, improving power efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of mid-range devices. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, but both brands generally offer decent color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Reno 5G, being an older model, likely features a more traditional camera setup. The V50e, benefiting from newer image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensors, is expected to deliver improved image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The focus should be on the main sensor resolution and aperture; larger sensors and wider apertures generally translate to better photos. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device would be a significant advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V50e’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a significant leap forward in efficiency compared to the Oppo Reno 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The Dimensity 7300’s newer architecture – Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – provides a noticeable performance boost in both CPU and GPU tasks. The Snapdragon 855 (Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485)) was a flagship chip in its time, but the Dimensity 7300’s 4nm process allows for sustained performance with less thermal throttling, crucial for extended gaming sessions. The V50e will likely handle demanding applications and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
The charging disparity is substantial. The vivo V50e’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of fully charging the device in under 40 minutes. The Oppo Reno 5G’s 20W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Dimensity 7300’s superior efficiency means the V50e will likely offer comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity. The faster charging of the V50e is a major convenience factor for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V50e if you prioritize future-proofing, demanding mobile gaming, and incredibly fast charging speeds. Its modern chipset and charging technology will provide a smoother, more responsive experience for years to come. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you're on a tighter budget and primarily need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography. It still offers a solid experience, but compromises on performance and charging speed.