vivo V50e vs. OnePlus Nord 2T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V50e emerges as the stronger contender. Its newer Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a performance edge and potentially better thermal management. The 90W charging is a significant advantage, drastically reducing downtime. While the Nord 2T remains a solid choice, the V50e’s advancements make it the more future-proof option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V50e | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 17 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 mm or 7.6 mm | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Ion 5600 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sapphire Blue, Pearl White | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | V2428 | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | € 249.70 / ₹ 24,999 | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V50e
- Faster 90W charging for quicker top-ups
- Newer, more efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Display specifications are currently unknown
- Camera details are lacking, making image quality assessment difficult
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Proven performance with the Dimensity 1300
- 636 nits peak brightness for good outdoor visibility
- 80W charging with Power Delivery (PD) support
- Older 6nm chipset is less power efficient
- May exhibit more thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T features a display capable of reaching 636 nits of peak brightness, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. However, the context data lacks specifics on the vivo V50e’s display. Given the V50e’s positioning, it’s likely to offer a similar brightness level. Both phones have an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term that doesn't provide meaningful differentiation. The absence of refresh rate data for the V50e is a notable omission; the Nord 2T’s 90Hz panel would be a significant advantage if the V50e doesn’t match it.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. The market segment suggests both will feature a primary camera capable of decent image quality in good lighting conditions. The lack of detail regarding secondary cameras (ultrawide, macro) on both devices suggests they are likely standard fare and won't be a major differentiating factor. Image processing style – whether leaning towards natural or more saturated colors – would be a key distinction, but this requires hands-on testing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V50e’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a newer generation chip compared to the Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300 (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation under sustained load and potentially longer battery life. While the Nord 2T’s CPU configuration includes a higher-clocked primary Cortex-A78 core (3.0 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), the V50e’s newer architecture and more efficient process likely offset this advantage. The Nord 2T’s CPU also includes three additional A78 cores, which could benefit multi-threaded tasks. However, the V50e’s newer GPU architecture should provide a noticeable boost in gaming performance.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo V50e’s 90W wired charging is significantly faster than the OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W wired charging with PD. This means the V50e can replenish its battery from 0-100% much quicker, a crucial advantage for users who prioritize minimal downtime. The Nord 2T’s PD support allows for wider compatibility with chargers, but the speed advantage clearly goes to the V50e.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V50e if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding apps and games, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. This phone is ideal for users who frequently multitask, game on the go, or simply dislike waiting for their phone to power up. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prefer a device with a well-established reputation for reliability and a balanced feature set, and if you aren't as concerned about having the absolute latest chipset.