vivo V50e vs. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed and convenience, the vivo V50e is the clear winner. Its 90W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Dimensity 7300 offers a significant performance uplift. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus remains a compelling option for those who value proven endurance and a more budget-friendly price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V50e | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 17 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 mm or 7.6 mm | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sapphire Blue, Pearl White | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | V2428 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | € 249.70 / ₹ 24,999 | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V50e
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Battery capacity currently unknown
- Camera specifications are limited
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Excellent 114-hour endurance rating
- Proven and reliable Snapdragon 765 platform
- Adequate peak brightness of 543 nits
- Slow 20W charging
- Older chipset compared to the Dimensity 7300
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, suggesting similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s measured peak brightness of 543 nits is a known quantity. The vivo V50e’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making it difficult to assess its brightness and color accuracy. Without knowing the panel technology used in the V50e (e.g., AMOLED vs. LCD), it’s hard to determine if it offers superior viewing angles or color reproduction. The Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness is adequate for outdoor visibility, but the V50e *could* potentially offer a more compelling visual experience if it utilizes a higher-quality panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is challenging. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric flagship. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus likely relies on software optimization to enhance image quality, while the vivo V50e’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor and image signal processor (ISP). It's reasonable to assume the V50e, being a newer device, *may* benefit from more advanced computational photography features.
Performance
The vivo V50e’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial leap forward in processing power compared to the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm). The Dimensity 7300’s newer architecture – featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz versus the Snapdragon’s Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.3 GHz – translates to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 4nm fabrication process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Snapdragon 765 is still capable, the Dimensity 7300 is geared towards a more demanding user experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life under typical usage. However, its 20W wired charging is comparatively slow. The vivo V50e, with its 90W wired charging, drastically reduces charging times – likely achieving a full charge in under 40 minutes. While the V50e’s battery capacity is unknown, the significantly faster charging speed mitigates concerns about potential battery life compromises. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly benefit from the V50e’s charging capabilities, while those who prioritize multi-day battery life may lean towards the Moto G 5G Plus.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V50e if you need incredibly fast charging, a more modern processor for demanding apps and games, and are willing to potentially trade some battery endurance for that performance. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prioritize long-lasting battery life, a reliable and well-tested platform, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset or fastest charging speeds.