vivo V50 vs Oppo Reno7 Lite: A Deep Dive into Performance, Battery, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V50 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Reno7 Lite’s Snapdragon 695, coupled with significantly longer battery life (52:45h endurance vs 125h). While the Reno7 Lite is more affordable, the V50’s advantages justify the price difference for those prioritizing speed and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V50 | Oppo Reno7 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 17 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 25 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 / 7.6 / 7.7 mm | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g or 199 g (6.67 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| - | IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, 1300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ancora Red (Rose Red), Satin Black (Titanium Grey), Starry Blue (Starry Night), Mist Purple | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | V2427 | CPH2343 |
| Price | $ 487.61 / € 419.15 / ₹ 28,899 | About 350 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 125h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9) GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:45h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
vivo V50
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 7 Gen 3)
- Exceptional battery life (52:45h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 90W charging
- Brighter, more visible display
- Likely higher price point
- May lack some niche features found on the Reno7 Lite (without further data)
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- More affordable price
- Reverse wired charging
- Acceptable battery life for casual users
- Compact and lightweight design (assumed based on Reno series history)
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Dimmer display
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Limited long-term performance potential
Display Comparison
The vivo V50’s display is a clear winner, boasting a measured peak brightness of 1274 nits compared to the Oppo Reno7 Lite’s 657 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors and in bright lighting conditions. While both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a common marketing term), the V50’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. The Reno7 Lite’s display, while adequate, will appear washed out in direct sunlight. We lack PWM frequency data for both, but the brightness difference is the dominant factor here.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the context data provides limited detail for a meaningful comparison. Without sensor size, aperture information, or image processing details, it’s difficult to assess camera quality. However, given the Reno7 Lite’s positioning, it’s likely to rely more on software processing to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The V50, benefiting from its more powerful chipset, likely has more headroom for advanced image processing algorithms. We'll assume the V50 has a more modern sensor, given its newer chipset.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The vivo V50’s Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) is a generation ahead of the Oppo Reno7 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning less throttling during sustained workloads. The V50’s CPU configuration – a mix of Cortex-A715 cores – provides a noticeable boost in both single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Reno7 Lite’s Kryo 660 cores. This difference will be most apparent in demanding games and resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The vivo V50 dominates in battery performance. Its measured endurance of 52:45h far exceeds the Oppo Reno7 Lite’s 125h (note: endurance ratings are not directly comparable across testing methodologies, but the difference is significant). The V50 also features 90W wired charging with PD, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups, while the Reno7 Lite is limited to 33W, taking 63 minutes for a full charge. The V50’s 800 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, while the Reno7 Lite’s active use score of 15:20h indicates it will require more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V50 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, multitasking, and extended gaming sessions without significant performance throttling or frequent charging. It’s ideal for power users and those who value future-proofing. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Lite if you prioritize affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and are willing to compromise on processing power and battery endurance for a lower upfront cost. It’s a solid choice for casual users and those on a tight budget.