The vivo V40e and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, they diverge in key areas like charging speed, display brightness, and CPU architecture, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging and 1283 nits peak brightness provide a tangible advantage over the vivo V40e's 80W charging and unspecified display capabilities. However, the V40e's Dimensity 7300 offers a newer CPU architecture.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 25 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 7.5 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired
Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Royal Bronze, Mint Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2403 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo V40e
- Potentially more efficient CPU architecture (Dimensity 7300)
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Sleek design (assumed based on vivo's design language)
- Slower charging speed (80W vs 120W)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Older CPU core design
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (100% in 19 minutes)
- High peak display brightness (1283 nits)
- Newer CPU architecture (Cortex-A715)
- Potentially less efficient CPU overall
- May lack reverse wireless charging (needs confirmation)
- Larger size and weight (typical for phones with larger batteries)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 1283 nits, a substantial advantage for outdoor use and HDR content viewing. While the vivo V40e's display specifications are currently unavailable, the Redmi's brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, common in this price range, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. Without knowing the V40e's panel type, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or potential features like LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, but the Redmi's brightness alone is a significant differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo V40e, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a high-resolution main sensor (likely 200MP, based on market trends for this model) with optical image stabilization (OIS). This combination promises excellent detail and low-light performance. The V40e's camera system will likely focus on providing a versatile experience, but without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it's difficult to assess its capabilities against the Redmi's anticipated flagship-level camera. We can assume both phones will include standard ultrawide and macro lenses, but the quality of these secondary sensors is often less critical.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek's 4nm process technology, contributing to improved efficiency. However, the CPU architectures differ significantly. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features the Cortex-A715, a newer generation core clocked at 2.8 GHz, paired with Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. The vivo V40e employs the older Cortex-A78 (2.5 GHz) and A55 cores. This suggests the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will offer a performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks and potentially better sustained performance due to the more modern architecture. The Dimensity 7300 in the V40e may compensate with a more powerful GPU, but the CPU difference is notable. The Redmi's active use battery score of 10:38h suggests efficient power management despite the faster CPU.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines with its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the vivo V40e's 80W charging. While the V40e's charging is still fast, the Redmi's speed is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 10:38h active use score indicates excellent battery life despite the faster charging, suggesting optimized power management. The V40e also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, which the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also supports.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V40e if you prioritize a potentially more efficient CPU architecture with the Dimensity 7300 and value reverse wireless charging. This phone suits users who engage in moderate multitasking and appreciate a balanced feature set. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and longer sustained performance as evidenced by its 10:38 active use battery score. This is the phone for power users and media consumers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is a capable chipset, sustained performance is always a concern. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s larger chassis and potentially more robust cooling system (details not provided) should mitigate throttling better than smaller devices. User reviews will be crucial to confirm real-world gaming performance and thermal behavior.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the vivo V40e still considered fast charging in 2024?
80W charging is still considered fast, capable of fully charging a typical smartphone battery in around 40-50 minutes. However, it's significantly slower than the 120W charging on the Redmi Note 13 Pro+, which can achieve a full charge in under 20 minutes. The difference is noticeable for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
❓ How does the Dimensity 7300 in the vivo V40e compare to the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of power efficiency?
Both chipsets are built on the 4nm process, indicating similar efficiency levels. However, the newer CPU architecture in the Dimensity 7200 Ultra (Cortex-A715) may offer slight improvements in power efficiency during certain tasks. Real-world usage will determine the actual difference in battery life.
