vivo V40e vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. However, the vivo V40e’s significantly faster 80W charging and newer Dimensity 7300 chipset offer compelling advantages for those who value speed and convenience over computational photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V40e | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 25 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 02 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 7.5 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+ | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Royal Bronze, Mint Green | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | V2403 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V40e
- 80W wired charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Newer Dimensity 7300 chipset for potentially better efficiency
- Reverse wired charging for topping up accessories
- Camera performance likely lags behind the Pixel 7a
- Software updates may be less frequent and slower than Pixel
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Google’s Tensor G2 excels in AI-powered features
- Guaranteed software updates and a clean Android experience
- Slow 18W charging compared to the V40e
- Tensor G2 may exhibit thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the V40e’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, potentially impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (implied by its segment) offers smoother scrolling compared to a standard 60Hz panel, which the V40e may or may not have. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel is expected to deliver superior contrast and color accuracy, crucial for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms to deliver exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While the V40e’s camera specifications are not detailed, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s consistently excellent results. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from advanced stabilization and dynamic range. The absence of detailed V40e camera specs makes a direct sensor comparison impossible, but the Pixel 7a’s reputation in this segment is well-established.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a unique CPU configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores for peak performance and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. This contrasts with the vivo V40e’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm) which utilizes 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Tensor G2’s X1 cores offer higher clock speeds, the Dimensity 7300’s newer architecture and 4nm process potentially provide better sustained performance and thermal efficiency. The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 excels in AI tasks, while the V40e’s Dimensity 7300 is geared towards raw processing power. The V40e's newer chipset may also benefit from more recent optimizations.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a’s endurance rating of 76 hours suggests solid battery life, despite its relatively slow 18W charging. The vivo V40e, however, boasts an impressive 80W wired charging capability, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time. While the V40e’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging significantly mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Pixel 7a also supports 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the V40e, offering added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V40e if you need blazing-fast charging, frequently game or use demanding apps, and prioritize a newer chipset architecture. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a best-in-class camera experience, seamless software updates, and benefit from Google’s AI-powered features like Magic Eraser and Call Screen. The Pixel 7a is ideal for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.