vivo V40 vs. Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the vivo V40 is the clear winner, offering a substantial 15:06h active use battery life. However, power users and gamers will find the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 120W charging a more compelling package, despite the shorter battery runtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V40 | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 17 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 03 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75 x 7.6 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10+, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | Zeiss optics, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Silver (Titanium Grey), Nebula Purple (Lotus Purple), Ganges Blue, Moonlight White, Sunglow Peach | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | V2348 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | ₹ 36,999 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.97 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo V40
- Exceptional battery life (15:06h active use)
- High peak display brightness (1353 nits)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful chipset compared to the competition
- Slower charging speeds (80W wired)
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging (19 minutes to full)
- 50W wireless charging support
- Shorter battery life (12:32h active use)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but their display priorities differ. The vivo V40 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1353 nits, exceeding the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 1228 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight for the V40. While both likely employ AMOLED panels, the V40’s higher brightness suggests a potentially more advanced panel configuration. Details regarding refresh rates and PWM dimming are missing, but the V40’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the 14T Pro will likely have a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Dimensity 9300+’s processing capabilities will be more effective at leveraging any advanced camera features. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera systems, but the 14T Pro’s chipset gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ is the performance champion here. Its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4 GHz, coupled with three additional Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85 GHz, significantly outpaces the vivo V40’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, with its Cortex-A715 cores, is still capable, but the Dimensity 9300+ offers a substantial leap in CPU and GPU performance, crucial for demanding games and multitasking. The 14T Pro’s architecture is geared towards sustained peak performance, while the V40 prioritizes efficiency.
Battery Life
The vivo V40’s 15:06h active use score is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 12:32h. This difference is substantial and will be noticeable in everyday use. While the 14T Pro compensates with incredibly fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in 19 minutes) and 50W wireless charging, the V40’s longer runtime reduces the need for frequent top-ups. The V40 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the 14T Pro, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V40 if you need a phone that reliably lasts a full day and beyond, even with heavy use, and value efficient performance over raw speed. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, and are willing to compromise on ultimate battery endurance.