vivo V40 Lite vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Mid-Range Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its significantly longer battery life (10:28h active use) and faster 68W charging outweigh the V40 Lite’s slightly newer chipset. While the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is efficient, the Edge 40 Neo offers a more complete package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V40 Lite | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 66, 75, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 14 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 14 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back or plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.8 x 7.7 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 188 g (6.31 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, PD Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Classy Brown, Dreamy White | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | $ 127.08 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V40 Lite
- Potentially better thermal efficiency due to 4nm process
- Reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Recent Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Lacks published battery life data
- Slower 44W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Fast 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Bright 1073 nit display
- Dimensity 7030 built on a 6nm process (less efficient than 4nm)
- Image processing may not appeal to all users
- Software update commitment unclear
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the V40 Lite, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness translates to a more vibrant and usable experience in direct sunlight. The absence of refresh rate information for the V40 Lite is a drawback; the Edge 40 Neo’s panel is likely to offer smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of sensor information for both devices. However, focusing on lens capabilities, the Edge 40 Neo likely prioritizes overall image quality. The V40 Lite’s camera specs are currently unknown, making a direct comparison difficult. The Edge 40 Neo’s image processing is known for its natural color reproduction, while vivo often leans towards more saturated images. Without detailed sensor data, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, has a clock speed advantage over the vivo V40 Lite’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78). Both chips are built on 6nm and 4nm processes respectively, suggesting the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 will be more power efficient. However, the Dimensity 7030’s core configuration and higher clock speeds likely translate to better multi-core performance, beneficial for demanding tasks like video editing. The V40 Lite’s 4nm process *should* mitigate some of the performance gap through improved thermal management, but real-world testing would be needed to confirm.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly wins in battery performance. Its 10:28h active use score demonstrates significantly better endurance than what we’d expect from the V40 Lite, which lacks published battery life data. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging is substantially faster than the V40 Lite’s 44W charging, allowing for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The V40 Lite does offer reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories, but the Edge 40 Neo’s superior charging speed and endurance are more broadly appealing.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V40 Lite if you prioritize a very recent chipset and potentially longer software support from vivo. It’s a good fit for users who frequently switch between apps and value a modern processor. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize battery life, fast charging, and a brighter display. This phone is ideal for media consumers, travelers, and anyone who needs a phone that can reliably last a full day.