vivo V40 Lite 4G vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly longer battery life (10:28h active use) and brighter display outweigh the V40 Lite’s faster charging, offering a more consistently enjoyable experience. While the V40 Lite’s 80W charging is impressive, the Edge 40 Neo’s overall package is more balanced.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 25 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 25 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 15 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Carbon Black, Pearl Violet | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- Extremely fast 80W wired charging
- Familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Edge 40 Neo
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7030 processor
- Slightly slower charging speed (68W)
- May lack reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While the V40 Lite’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Edge 40 Neo’s brightness, combined with its likely higher contrast ratio, will deliver a more immersive viewing experience. We can assume both use AMOLED panels given the market segment, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo V40 Lite 4G, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from more advanced image processing capabilities inherent in the Dimensity 7030’s ISP. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely to offer better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 40 Neo, if equipped, would further enhance image quality, especially in videos. We can assume both phones will include a standard set of lenses, but the Edge 40 Neo’s processor gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the vivo V40 Lite 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7030 are architecturally superior to the Cortex-A73 cores in the Snapdragon 685, resulting in faster single-core performance and improved responsiveness. While both chipsets are fabricated on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 7030’s core configuration translates to better overall performance, particularly in demanding tasks and gaming. The Snapdragon 685 is adequate for everyday use, but the Edge 40 Neo will handle multitasking and graphically intensive applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s battery performance is a standout feature, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This significantly surpasses what we’d expect from the V40 Lite, which lacks published battery life data. While the V40 Lite boasts 80W wired charging, reaching 45% in 15 minutes, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging still manages 50% in the same timeframe. The Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery capacity and efficiency mean you’ll spend less time tethered to a charger, despite the slightly slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are frequently near a power outlet. Its 80W charging can quickly top up the battery when you have limited time. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value all-day battery life, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.