vivo V30 vs. Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus emerges as the winner, boasting a 16:34 active use score. However, the vivo V30’s brighter display and faster 80W charging offer compelling advantages for media consumers and those valuing quick top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 04 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 04 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4 (market/region dependent) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 48 min Reverse wired | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black | Black, Grey |
| Models | V2318 | A142P |
| Price | About 690 EUR | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
vivo V30
- Faster 80W wired charging for quick power-ups.
- Brighter display for improved outdoor visibility.
- Potentially better multi-core efficiency with Snapdragon 7 Gen 3.
- Shorter battery life compared to the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus.
- Charging speed advantage may not offset battery life difference for heavy users.
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Longer battery life for all-day usage.
- Competitive Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset for strong performance.
- Unique and minimalist design aesthetic.
- Slower 50W charging compared to the vivo V30.
- Lower peak display brightness may struggle in direct sunlight.
Display Comparison
The vivo V30 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1253 nits, compared to the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 1097 nits. This difference translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the V30’s brighter panel will draw slightly more power. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, but the brightness advantage clearly favors the V30 for users who consume a lot of HDR content or spend significant time outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning of both devices suggests a focus on versatile camera systems. The absence of megapixel counts or sensor sizes in the provided data makes it difficult to assess image quality. We can infer that both phones will likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will depend heavily on image processing algorithms and lens quality, which are not specified.
Performance
Both phones employ 4nm chipsets, but differ in their architecture. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro with a 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 core configuration, suggesting a focus on peak performance. The vivo V30, however, features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, utilizing a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 and 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 configuration alongside 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. This suggests a more balanced approach to sustained performance and efficiency. The Dimensity 7350 Pro’s higher clock speeds may offer a slight edge in bursty tasks, but the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s architecture could provide better multi-core efficiency. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus's CPU configuration suggests a stronger focus on single-core performance, potentially benefiting less-threaded applications.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus demonstrably wins in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 16:34h versus the vivo V30’s 15:01h. This nearly 1.5-hour difference is significant for users who prioritize all-day battery life. While the vivo V30 compensates with 80W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 48 minutes, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging, while slower (100% in 56 minutes), is still respectable. The V30’s faster charging is beneficial for quick top-ups, but the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s superior battery life reduces the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V30 if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption and value the convenience of significantly faster 80W charging. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you need maximum battery endurance, appreciate a clean software experience, and prefer a more unique and minimalist aesthetic. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is the better choice for users who frequently find themselves away from a power outlet.